timemagazinenew.jpg photo1.jpg timecj.jpg Peacemakers

Tuesday, November 10, 2009

Meme: Joe Trippi's Eleven-Eleven 1111Campaign - America's and Britain's Veterans have given so much. Now, you can give back.

Joe Trippi, one of America's greatest bloggers, has launched Eleven Eleven Campaign. The objective of the Eleven Eleven Campaign is simple: to get 11 million Americans to donate $11 to support America’s Veterans. Here is a copy of Joe's latest tweet on Twitter:
Tomorrow is Veterans Day, and now is our moment to encourage our friends, family members and colleagues to join us... http://bit.ly/9Iu9s
33 minutes ago from Facebook
1111Campaign
Eleven Eleven
Hey Joe! Britain's Veterans have given so much too!

Stand with 11 million Brits and Give £11 to Support Britain’s Vets!

Take Action Today
Click here to support Britain's Veterans
November 11, 2009

Britain's Veterans have given so much.  Now, you can give back.

Labels: , , ,

Monday, January 16, 2006

Africa to get first female leader

Harvard educated Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf is to be sworn in as Liberia's president, to become Africa's first elected female leader.

The swearing-in ceremony will make Mrs Johnson-Sirleaf Liberia's first elected head of state since the end of 14 years of war in 2003.

Africa to get first female leader

BBC news today reports on the challenges which lie ahead as she begins her six-year term are great:
After a quarter of a century of war and misrule, Liberia's road network is in ruins, there is no national telephone network, no national electricity grid and no piped water.

Mrs Johnson-Sirleaf has also pledged to fight widespread corruption.

A further challenge is to reintegrate the 100,000 ex-combatants, including many former child soldiers, into civilian life.
- - -

Quote of the Year

"I am excited by the potential of what I represent - the aspirations and expectations of women in Liberia, African women and women all over the world" - Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf

Monday, December 19, 2005

Africa's first female president is ready to repay a favour: Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf's story

An Act of Kindness 20 Years Ago, Resonating Today
By HELENE COOPER
Published: New York Times December 18, 2005

In Liberia, stories about near-death run-ins with the deranged gun-toting maniacs who have run the country into the ground for the last quarter-century are a dime a dozen. Even the president-elect has one.

Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf's story goes like this: In 1985, Mrs. Johnson-Sirleaf, then 47 and a leader of a political party that opposed the strongman Samuel Doe, was arrested during a roundup of Mr. Doe's political opponents after an attempted coup. About six soldiers came at night to her house, hauled her to the army barracks in Schieffelin, outside Monrovia, and threw her into a cell with 15 men.

Just past midnight, the soldiers returned to the cell with a rope, which they used to tie together the hands of all the prisoners, except one. When they ran out of rope they relieved Mrs. Johnson-Sirleaf of her shoelaces, and used them to tie the last man to the group. As she stood, shaking, in a corner, the soldiers led the 15 prisoners outside. The rat-a-tat of the machine guns sounded, as the men were executed.

Twenty years later, the one prisoner in that cell who was not executed that night is about to become president, the first woman ever elected president of an African country. Mrs. Johnson-Sirleaf won 59.4 percent of the vote in the runoff election held last month, beating a former soccer player, George Weah.

But Mr. Weah - echoing the very behavior and mistakes of the old-guard leadership he has criticized - is still refusing to accept the results. He claims the November elections were fraudulent, and has fired up the jobless young men who make up his base to take to Monrovia's already torn-up streets to protest. Last week, he told his disgruntled followers that "revolution is a noble cause."

"It is our right to seek justice, and we will use all means to obtain that," he said. His supporters subsequently clashed with police and United Nations peacekeepers with their usual chanting of "No Weah, No Peace."

This is all the same rhetoric used by Charles Taylor, Robert Mugabe, and all of Africa's various strongmen, militants and warlords who, if there were any real justice, would be run off the continent. This is the rhetoric that stirred up Liberia's never-ending civil wars, that helped incite the bloodbath in neighboring Sierra Leone, that led to so many pointless deaths in Ivory Coast.

The result of this useless carnage is clearly visible on the streets of Monrovia, where empty buildings, damaged beyond recognition by artillery shelling, shelter squatters with nowhere else to live. The country has not had electricity since 1991. There is no running water. There are few schools, no factories, nothing to provide any kind of hope to the youths who spend both their days and nights on the streets.

Can a 67-year-old grandmother fix all this? Mrs. Johnson-Sirleaf, who came to New York and Washington last week for a victory lap, argues that she can, in part because she is a 67-year-old grandmother. Forget about her Harvard education or her experience as a World Bank economist, or the fact that she is the darling of the Western donor groups that Liberia desperately needs. That will all help, but it's gravy. What really will distinguish her is that she will bring to this psychologically and socially broken place the simple, clear and rational thinking of a straightforward African woman.

Take, for example, her views on rape. In Liberia, as in so many other places in Africa, there has been no real law on the books that stipulates punishment for rape. So the sexual predators, who see rape as their only means to exert power over vulnerable women, are not prosecuted. A few months ago, Mrs. Johnson-Sirleaf and a handful of female lawyers in Liberia asked the legislature to prescribe sentences for rapists. "Do you know the farthest the legislature would go is seven years?" Mrs. Johnson-Sirleaf said, disgustedly.

Still, in West Africa, where girls of 9 are often the prey of men in their 50's, seven years is something. Mrs. Johnson-Sirleaf's first test of this came a few weeks ago, when reports surfaced that a Nigerian soldier who was part of the international peacekeeping mission in Liberia was suspected of raping a 9-year-old girl. An enraged Mrs. Johnson-Sirleaf was quickly on the phone to the head of the peacekeeping operation.

"Don't let him leave Liberia," she ordered. "If he leaves Liberia and goes back to Nigeria, they'll free him."

Then she went on the radio with a warning to all: "I've got grand-daughters that age," she recalls saying. "Those who engage in rape better know that from now on, we're going to prosecute."

Prosecution for men who rape 9-year-old girls should be pretty basic, but not so in places where endless war has broken down social constraints, and a population becomes so demoralized that the thread of humanity is stretched to the breaking point. Mrs. Johnson-Sirleaf, who is supposed to be inaugurated on Jan. 16, says she plans to dig deep into her past, to that night 20 years ago, to try to keep that thread intact.

On that night, after the 15 men were killed, one of those soldiers entered her cell and tried to rape her. He was stopped by another soldier, who told her, "I will sleep on the floor here in your cell tonight so no one hurts you."

Africa's first female president is ready to repay the favor, writ large.

Friday, November 11, 2005

Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf - Liberia's 'Iron lady' claims win

Things are looking up. Africa is poised to declare its first elected female leader.

Harvard educated banker Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf, known as the "Iron Lady", has claimed victory as the first woman to be elected president of Liberia - or anywhere in Africa.

Monday, October 24, 2005

Interview: Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf - One of two top candidates for Liberian presidency

16 October 2005 Liberia's Election: High Turnout and High Hope:

Liberia holds its first elections since the end of the 14-year civil war two years ago, drawing 1.3 million voters. The first official results show former soccer player George Weah and former World Bank economist Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf as the leading figures in the race. We speak with Liberian Emira Woods, of the Institute for Policy Studies, about voters' hopes for the country's future and challenges stemming from the past. [includes rush transcript]
- - -

Yesterday, Liberia held its first elections since a 14-year civil war ended two years ago. Former professional soccer player George Weah and the Harvard trained former World Bank economist Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf, have emerged as the frontrunners among 22 candidates for the presidency. If Johnson-Sirleaf were to win she would become Africa's first female president.

The first official election results taken from a fraction of polling stations declare Weah ahead in the race. He has 27.5% of the nearly 35,000 votes counted and Johnson-Sirleaf has 16.7%, according to the BBC. It may take several days until the full results are in from the 3,000 polling stations because there are few paved roads, no electrical grid and no nationwide telephone system in Liberia.

Modern Liberia was founded by freed slaves from the United States in 1822. Under the rule of former President Charles Taylor, Liberia was immersed in a long, brutal civil war and in conflict around the region. An estimated half-a-million Liberians fled into exile, another half-million were displaced inside the country and a quarter of a million died.

More than 1.3 million people registered to vote in this election, which represents the possibility of a more stable future for the country. Voters waited overnight and in the blaring sun in order to cast their ballots and international observers praised the process as free of violence or irregularities. On the way to casting their ballots, the two leading candidates expressed optimism about the future of their country.

Emira Woods, Co-director of Foreign Policy In Focus at the Institute for Policy Studies. She is originally from Liberia.
- - -

RUSH TRANSCRIPT

AMY GOODMAN: On the way to casting their ballots the two leading candidates expressed optimism about the future of their country.

GEORGE WEAH: Well, the election is not about my popularity. What you see on the outside is a true manifestation that the people are tired of being abused, being neglected, and they want a change. And in me, they see hope, they have confidence, and they know because of the love for them and the love for my country, I can bring about a change.

ELLEN JOHNSON-SIRLEAF: I'm so excited, because Liberian people are really ready to vote. It's a wonderful feeling. They want to be a part of this historic event, and I think that Liberia is on the way to recovery, to renewal.

AMY GOODMAN: George Weah and Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf, the two top candidates for Liberian presidency. Official results won't be known for a few days. We're joined now by Emira Woods. She is the co-director of Foreign Policy in Focus at the Institute for Policy Studies. We're broadcasting from Washington, D.C. Welcome, Emira Woods.

EMIRA WOODS: Thank you. Thanks for doing this segment, Amy.

AMY GOODMAN: Well, can you talk about the significance of the Liberian elections? You're originally from Liberia?

EMIRA WOODS: Yes, and clearly this is a historic moment. After 23 years of conflict and coups and chaos, really, the Liberian people have an opportunity to finally participate again in a political process, to help decide the future of their country, so there is a tremendous exuberance throughout Monrovia, throughout the country really, with people trying to really be a part of the process, engaging in debates, engaging in helping to set the national priorities. There is an active press that has been vibrant over the last few weeks. But really even beyond the press, there is an active citizenry with people debating in the marketplace, debating on the street corners, really putting forward what they see as the national priorities and which of the leaders they think can help put together an administration, put together the leadership to implement those priorities.

AMY GOODMAN: So let's talk about the candidates. George Weah, many people may know as a famous soccer player. What about his run for the presidency?

EMIRA WOODS: Well, it has been really interesting. He has a tremendous following, particularly of young people. He is seen as someone who didn't have a high level of education himself, but who can really reach out to the former child soldiers, to those who felt themselves pushed out of opportunities, whether it's educational opportunities or job opportunities, so there is a real sense that he is one of the people, in spite of his tremendous fame and fortune. So he has a tremendous following, particularly within the youth, which is a dominant proportion of the population right now.

AMY GOODMAN: And Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf?

EMIRA WOODS: She is a Harvard-trained economist. She was at the World Bank and the UN, is seen as a technocrat with a lot of contacts in the international community. She is someone who ran in the elections in 1997 against Charles Taylor and has been a part of the Liberia political scene for quite some time. She was Finance Minister under Doe and has really been a part of the process for a very long time. She has a tremendous following, particularly among women throughout the country and is seen as someone who has helped galvanize women in the electorate and is seen as potentially a way to put forward a different voice, a different leadership for Liberia.

AMY GOODMAN: She would be the first female president of an African country. Can you talk about the significance of that, an emerging female leadership in Africa?

EMIRA WOODS: Well, this is an interesting question. She would be the first sitting president. There was an interim president, Ruth Perry, a few years back, but just for a very short time. If she were to emerge as the leader, and we have to say there are still many, many days to go before the official results are out, and there may well be a run-off election between the top two candidates. So we may not know until early November who actually emerges as the leader.

But if Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf were to be the leader, she would be one of many emerging women leaders throughout the African continent. We have to recognize the African Union, newly formed, has the head of its Commission for Africa, a woman, Gertrude Mongella. We have to also recognize that there is new leadership emerging. The Pan-African Parliament, for example, has tremendous leadership from women. If you look at the parliamentary members from many countries: Rwanda, 50% of the members of Parliament are women; South Africa, it's about 30% that are women. If you look throughout the continent, many, many countries, from to Mozambique to Uganda, have high levels of women's participation in the political processes. So you see new openings emerging for women leaders.

It is mandated in certain cases. The African Union said that going to the Pan-African Parliament there must be at least two women represented in each of the delegations. Many of the delegations in the Pan-African Parliament have, in fact, three, four or even five women in certain cases. So, you see a new opening. And if you compare many of the parliaments even to the U.S., clearly there is tremendous support for women candidacy, women뭩 leadership in political processes, that is setting forward a new way for Africa.

AMY GOODMAN: And even in some constitutions, doesn't it require participation of women in leadership positions?

EMIRA WOODS: You can see both the Namibia, Mozambique, South Africa, many of the new constitutions have specific affirmative action clauses that encourage women's leadership in the political process. So this is often a story, I'm so glad you asked this, because it's often a story that goes untold when it comes to Africa. But I think it is an important story, when you think about the future political development and the changing political landscape of the continent.

AMY GOODMAN: We're talking with Emira Woods, who is with the Institute for Policy Studies, herself born in Liberia. Liberia, a country of freed slaves. Tell us the history and also the involvement of the United States, the Firestone Company.

EMIRA WOODS: Well, once again, thank you for asking these questions. They are right on target. If you look at the history of Liberia, the one correction I would say is that Liberia was founded, yes, by the American Colonization Society, but it was a compilation of people who came from America, from the Caribbean and from other African countries that founded Liberia in the 1820s. And if you look at the history of Liberia, clearly America has had a critical role to play since its founding. Of course, we know the capital city, named after James Monroe, the U.S. Speaker of the House, also played a critical role in the 1800s in the founding of Liberia.

But since then, American companies have continued to have their influence in Liberia. 1922 the Firestone Rubber Company went in and set up plantations in Liberia. And you see from 1922 to today not only the exploitation of the rubber, the extraction of Liberia's vital resources, for pennies. In the 1920s, it was six cents per acre that Firestone paid for extraction of the rubber.

A new agreement has recently been signed, just a few months back with the pushing and pressuring from the U.S. ambassador in Liberia, where Firestone extended its lease agreement with Liberia for a further 37 years. So, the Firestone Company, which is essentially running a plantation, exploiting labor, exploiting particularly child labor, continues to have its way, extracting the resources for minimal amounts, putting the rubber on a ship and sending it off to Indiana, essentially, without helping to bring about development in Liberia.

The Mattel Steel Company, another American company, has recently signed a contract again with this interim government using the space of the transitional period to go in to sign new contracts that further exploit the Liberian people. So the richness of the country, whether it's the iron ore, or the rubber, the gold, the diamonds have really been extracted for pennies, essentially, throughout history now of Liberia, and really no benefits coming to the Liberian people.

If you look at the conditions -- I just came back this past August ?you know, no running water, no electricity, no functioning school systems or health care systems. I mean, total breakdown of the infrastructure because of this 23 years of coups and conflicts. There is so much that is needed to help benefit the condition of people's lives in Liberia. Clearly there should be greater corporate accountability and responsibility, and the U.S. could play a critical role.

The other issue that is relevant for Liberia today is the question of Liberia's debt. Liberia owes $3 billion to the international community. It is a debt that is hanging like, you know, the shield over the necks of the Liberian peoples. And clearly, with all of the enthusiasm for debt cancellation from the G-8 meeting to the World Bank and the IMF meetings this September, why is it that Liberia is left off the table? Why is it that these countries where the debt was accrued under dictators, under corrupt leadership, have to still bare the burden of that debt now and into the future? These are the questions that really need to be tackled, were we to think about not only a stable and secure path, but a firm economic footing for Liberia's future.

AMY GOODMAN: Well, Emira Woods, I want to thank you for being with us, and we will certainly continue to follow Liberia and also what happens in the presidential election.

EMIRA WOODS: Thank you.

AMY GOODMAN: Thank you. Emira Woods is with the Institute for Policy Studies.

Wednesday, May 25, 2005

Women take brunt of human rights abuse: Amnesty

In no way do I see myself as a feminist but I do feel strongly that women should be in charge of African countries for a change. To nurture peace and help heal. Africa needs mothering. By great women such as:

Wangari Maathai in Kenya

Gertrude Mongella in Tanzania

Winnie Byanyima in Uganda

Last year, Bishop Desmond Tutu said women should rule the world. Media baron Ted Turner said men have made such a mess of things, women should rule fo 100 years. Note AFPs report on the latest from London-based Amnesty International. Here is a copy:

Women and girls faced "horrific" levels of abuse in 2004 worldwide, Amnesty International said in its annual human rights review, blaming widespread rape and violence on a mix of "indifference, apathy and impunity".

From honour killings carried out by the victims' families to sexual violence used as a weapon of war, abuse frequently went unpunished and survivors were often abandoned by their own communities, the London-based group said.

Amnesty said it had sought in the past year to argue that violence against women in conflict situations was "an extreme manifestation of the discrimination and abuse they face in peacetime", notably domestic violence and sexual abuse.

"When political tensions degenerate into outright conflict, all forms of violence increase, including rape and other forms of sexual violence against women."

The annual report, covering 131 countries, noted abuse across the world but highlighted several grave examples: in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), both armed groups and UN forces are guilty of rape; in Turkey, family abuse of women is widespread; in Darfur, Sudan, gang rape is systemic; and in eastern Europe, economic need fuels the trafficking of women.

In Darfur, where a local rebellion sparked a brutal government backlash, Khartoum-backed militias have staged mass rapes, including of schoolgirls, and "frequently abducted" local women into sexual slavery, Amnesty said.

Tens of thousands of women and girls were also subject to rape and sexual slavery in the DRC, and as in Darfur, victims were often then abandoned by their husbands and families, "condemning them and their children to extreme poverty".

All parties in the ongoing conflicts in the eastern DRC have committed the abuses against women, including military and police officers, and United Nations peacekeepers charged with the protection of civilians.

The two African cases were "not exceptional", Amnesty warned.

Latin America had the highest risk of all types of sexual victimisation, according to UN report findings cited by Amnesty.

In Colombia, the group said, security forces, left-wing rebels and paramilitaries targeted women and girls to "sow terror, wreak revenge on adversaries and accumulate 'trophies of war'."

In Turkey, between one-third and one-half of all women are estimated to be victims of physical violence by their families - raped, beaten, murdered or forced to commit suicide - while the country sorely lacked shelters and legal protection for victims.

Amnesty noted some progress in Ankara, with legal reforms that recognised marital rape as a crime and did away with the possibility that a rapist's prison sentence could be reduced or annulled if he agreed to marry his victim. Still, authorities largely failed to investigate most women's complaints of abuse.

Serbia and Montenegro "remained a source, transit and destination country" for women and girls who were trafficked to the West into forced prostitution, while the problem existed throughout the poorer countries of Eastern Europe.

"With clients including international police and troops, the women and girls are too afraid to escape," Amnesty said. -AFP
- - -

Quotation

"When our resources become scarce, we fight over them. In managing our resources and in sustainable development, we plant the seeds of peace."

WANGARI MAATHAI, of Kenya, winner of the 2004 Nobel Peace Prize.

Gertrude Mongella - The first president of the Pan-African Parliament

At last, signs of great leadership in Africa: the remarkable Gertrude Mongella, is the highest ranking elected woman in Africa. Many refer to her as Mama Mongella or Mama Beijing.

Back in 1995 Gertrude Mongella was Secretary General of the high-profile UN conference on women in Beijing, China. Since then she's worked on women's issues at home in Tanzania and around the globe. Her goal is to lift women out of poverty and into political office so they too can shape history.

In her role today as the first president of the Pan-African Parliament, Mongella is fixing her sights on the challenges facing Africa. Addressing issues like civil war and violence, to poverty and AIDS, she's a strong believer that Africa needs to find ways to help itself. During the first African Women's Forum in Accra in January 1997, she shared her vision of leadership:

"If you want to be a leader," she said, "you have to be clear what you want and what you stand for. You must stand for principle. Principle will never let you down ... You have to be able to choose what are the principles worth dying for ... And you have to add on a little sacrifice. Leadership needs a lot of sacrifice - personal and public sacrifice."

Gertrude Ibengwa Mongella

Photo: Gertrude Mongella, an astute diplomat, at an official function at the US Embassy in Dar-es-Salaam, Tanzania.

At present, Mongella is a member of CCM's top decision-making organ, the National Executive Committee. She is also Tanzania's Goodwill Ambassador to the World Health Organisation, a member of the Council of The Future at Unesco and the President of NGO Advocacy in Africa.

She also serves as Special Advisor to the Economic Commission of Africa as well as a member of the AU's African Women's Committee for Peace and Development. Through an NGO she formed in 1996, Advocacy for Women in Africa (AWA), she is involved in the expansion of education in Ukerewe.

Further reading:

Via theconnection.org: interview. In 1996, Mama Beijing founded an NGO called Advocacy for Women in Africa (AWA), which is based in Tanzania. See Gertrude Mongella Profile.
- - -

A dialogue with Ambassador Gertrude Mongella, President of the Pan African Parliament

Note this interesting discussion with Gertrude Mongelia hosted by SARPN and the Southern African Catholic Bishops' Conference, chaired by Trevor Ncube, Pretoria, 14 September 2004.

See 'We must avoid being monkeys' Mail & Guardian (Johannesburg) - September 16, 2004 - AEGiS-DMG.
- - -

No education, no life

This is one of the most heartwarming reports relating to Chad and Sudan that has appeared in the press for a long time. It makes one want to concentrate on the future of Sudan: the children. They need an education and supplies of school materials. They need to learn how to forgive but not forget. Today, I am once again weary of reading about the mess the men in Sudan are making -- and of how Sudanese women are abused and left to pick up the pieces and keep life going.

The report dated April 27, 2005 is titled "Chadian camp lacks resources but does not skimp on school" ... the source is the UN High Commissioner for Refugees - by Bernard Ntwari In Iridimi camp - God bless them:

IRIDIMI, Chad, April 27 (UNHCR) - The ritual unfolds every time someone comes to visit. Schoolgirls and boys run up to surround the visitor and recite expressions learnt in English and French: "Hello, how are you, ok," they repeat. Some are proud to show they know how to count in English while others bombard the visitor with questions.

"Our children are going to build the future. We want to secure a good education for them so that they can help change the situation in our country later," says Hassan Mahamat Juma, one of the teachers in Iridimi camp, located nearly 65 km from Chad's border with Sudan. It is one of the 11 UNHCR camps hosting 200,000 Sudanese refugees in eastern Chad.

Since Iridimi camp opened in March last year, classes have started spontaneously on the initiative of refugee teachers. Despite the lack of resources, the education system is very well organised in the camp, where school-aged children make up about 30 percent of the 17,000-strong population. There is a school in every one of the camp's 10 zones, with young refugees attending either the central school or any of the nine branch schools.

Today, buildings are being constructed to improve schooling conditions. This has made the children very happy because their lessons, which focus on the Sudanese curriculum, help them remember their former life in Sudan. UNHCR, in collaboration with its partners and particularly the UN Children's Fund (UNICEF), has decided to finance this initiative to reinforce education. As part of this plan, UNICEF has just organised a training session for teachers.

"No education, no life," says Hassan, speaking not just as a teacher but also a father.

"We are satisfied with the attitude of the parents, who have proven to be reliable partners on education in the camp," says Christine Lamarque, who oversees community services for UNHCR in Iridimi. She adds that the refugees' top concern is their children's education in the camp.

The teachers are just as committed. "Most of their requests involve the supply of school materials, rather than salary increase," notes Lamarque. The devoted teachers are willing to double their workload to ensure that all registered students receive the education they deserve.

Adam Dewad Djibrin, 13, is in the third year of junior high school. He is happy not only to have passed in the upper class, and also that his brother and little sister are registered in school. "When I grow up, I will be a teacher to educate my sisters and brothers who have stayed in Sudan," he says.

"I will be a doctor when I grow up," adds another student, Oumar Fakara.

A vocational training centre will be opened in Iridimi camp to teach young refugees practical skills like sewing, shoe-repairing or woodworking. A nursery school will also be set up to promote education for little girls. Boys, too, will get the attention they need, with a new system to be established to educate those who tend to livestock for a living and thus are unable to attend school.

Give peace a chance: Make Winnie Byanyima President of Uganda

Of Winnie Byanyima, the author of nehanda dreams blog writes:

"The overawing combination of beauty, charm and simplicity belies the person that she is: a politician who has been a thorn in the side of Uganda's President Yoweri Museveni's government for the past 10 years. She grew up with the President, fought side by side with him and married his doctor-turned-enemy. Now, she wants the President's job ..."

Winnie Byanyima

Photo: Winnie Byanyima via report by Lillian Aluanga May 7, 2005. Excerpt:

Winnie Byanyima is a politician who has been a thorn in the side of Uganda's President Yoweri Museveni's government for the past 10 years.

She and Museveni go back a long way. They started out as friends growing up in their native Mbarara District, fought side by side in the National Resistance Army - which she joined in 1982 - and elected leaders under the National Resistance Movement.

Posted to London as high commissioner and to Paris as ambassador, Winnie returned to Uganda apparently cured of her fondness for Museveni, and married his doctor and comrade in arms, Colonel Kizza Besigye in 1999. Besigye fought a close race with Museveni in Uganda's 2001 presidential election and lost, though many said he had won. Winnie would have been the real President.

Besigye fled into exile, fearing for his life, but his wife stayed to rally the troops that had campaigned with them.

An aeronautical engineer with a masters degree in mechanical engineering, Winnie stepped down from her position as Member of Parliament for Mbarara Municipality in February, after 10 years.

The election, last week, of her successor seemed to close - if only temporarily - the chapter of her 10 years at the forefront of national politics - and to open another to a career at the continental level as director for Women, Gender and Development at the African Union in Addis Ababa.

But Winnie will not be gone from the Uganda political scene for long.

"I took time off national politics to work for African women, but I have been receiving a lot of requests from people back home who want me to contest for the Presidency in the next election.

She stops and pensively stares into the distance.

"I am reflecting on going for the presidency. If my husband is unable to return for the next election I may go for the seat since I feel the need to respond to the expectations of the people who supported us in the last election," she says.

Her voice mellows as she talks about her husband, who was forced into exile soon after he lost the 2001 election to Museveni, an election characterised by character jibes.

Seen by many as Museveni's first credible challenger to his then 15-year hold on power, Besigye once served as Museveni's physician during his stint in the bush during the armed struggle, and retired as a colonel. He later fell out with Museveni in the 1990s after accusing the National Resistance Movement of being undemocratic and corrupt.

Winnie admits that life has not been easy for her and her five-and-a-half-year-old son, Anselm Kizza Besigye, ever since her husband fled -- first to the United States then to South Africa -- owing to concerns over his safety.

"Sometimes I get to visit and spend time with him, but it has been difficult," she says. Is she afraid that her life too is in danger considering her political ambitions?

"God is my protector and so long as I live according to the laws of the land, then I have nothing to fear," she says.

Her delicate features belie the character hardened by the upheaval of fighting in a guerilla movement that ousted the remnants of former Ugandan president Milton Obote in 1986, making history as the first force on the continent to overthrow a government that had a conventional army.

A keen listener, Winnie remains protective of her family and politely declines to discuss details of her social life. She won't talk about her experiences in the NRM at the height of the struggle either, and seems a tad irritated by the 'intrusive question'.

"No. I'm sorry I cannot get into that. I'd much rather we talk about what I do and the issues I am addressing now," she says.

She defends her position on these issues as a deliberate move to 'demystify' women in leadership positions and break the 'mental blockage' that people have had about women holding high-level positions. "There is really nothing strange or special about us. I'd rather people, especially the media, focus on what we do and the issues we address in society," she says.

Winnie's resilience has helped her to not only make a mark on Uganda's political scene, but also propelled her into the limelight for her role in gender advocacy with non governmental organisations and forceful campaign against corruption.

Winnie has many firsts, among them being the first African woman to win Zonta International's Amelia Earhart Fellowship, which would have seen her working on a project that was a precursor of president Reagan's Star Wars programme. But she went into political activism instead.

She has trained politicians, civil society activists and government officials in more than 20 African and Asian countries and served on several expert and advisory panels of the United Nations Development Programme and the United Nations Fund for Women among others. And she has sat on numerous task forces of the Millennium Project on Gender Equality besides acting as advisor to the UN Commission on Science and Technology for Development and the Washington-based National Center on Research for Women.

Winnie has managed to emerge from her husband's shadow to wage her own political battles and is now eyeing the highest office in Uganda, come the next election.

Recalling the last election as 'tough', Winnie says she largely relied on educating and sensitising the public on their rights, factors that helped her win the election in Mbarara, Museveni's home turf, despite facing stiff opposition from a candidate who was largely favoured by the government.

Financial constraints

While admitting that many women political aspirants face financial constraints, she opines that governments should address the issue of political financing by enacting laws against bribery of voters.

"Women in Africa are yet to play their rightful role in politics because they remain excluded even though they have an important role to play in political decision making," she says.

"It's important to recognise that many African women come into politics without sufficient apprenticeship."

Women, she adds, face various obstacles in the political arena, depending on their starting levels.

"They (women) should be eager to learn and acquire skills for the job instead of simply imitating the way men have constructed and handled politics over the years."

Women, she says, should critically look at the process of political decision-making and challenge those processes that are unresponsive, exclude the poor and vulnerable, lack transparency, and favour the elite.

Kenyan women

Her face lights up as she fondly speaks of her Kenyan counterparts, whom she says defied all odds to make it in politics - despite having an unfavourable political climate compared to Uganda and Tanzania.

"I have great admiration for Kenyan women in politics and it makes me proud to see some of them who are now important players in their political parties. For many years, I worked together with my sisters in Kenya and have a lot of respect for the struggles they have waged especially in the constitution making process, gender equality legislation and advancing of African women's issues on international agenda," she says.

Those that immediately come to mind include Cabinet ministers Charity Ngilu, Martha Karua and assistant minister Beth Mugo, as well as Ms Phoebe Asiyo and former Kibwezi MP Agnes Ndetei. The list, she hastens to add, is not conclusive.

"Women plough the fields and feed their families and as such have an intimate knowledge of the production processes and challenges involved," she says.

"African nations continue to lag behind since women who would otherwise be out in the fields producing cash crops, crucial for economic growth, are doing work that remains unrecognised by the national budgets and at the same time denying them the right to work and earn a living," she says.

"Women are now able to persuade their governments to make important commitments to them on protocols concerning women's rights," she says, adding that she is happy to be working at the African Union at a time when African women have raised momentum towards gender equality.

Her work continues to give her a platform, which allows her to meet women from all over the world, whom she says face almost similar challenges in their struggle for equality.

Tags:

Thursday, April 07, 2005

Gandhi film plays to Palestinians

From the BBC UK News online 7 April, 2005:

The award-winning 1982 film Gandhi is being released across the West Bank and Gaza to try to persuade Palestinians to embrace non-violent resistance.

Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas and actor Ben Kingsley, who starred as the pacifist Indian leader in the film, attended the premiere in Ramallah.

The project is being co-sponsored by Jeff Skoll, the founder of the internet auction site EBay.

Reports say some Palestinians who saw the film were largely sceptical.

The epic film about non-violent resistance to British rulers in India will be shown in free screenings in the Palestinian territories, including refugee camps that are strongholds for militants and armed groups.

The film will also be shown to Palestinians in Lebanon, Syria and Jordan and be distributed on DVD to youth groups.

Powerful theme

Mr Skoll said the initiative had the backing of the Palestinian leadership.

"We met with President Abbas, who was nice to us and supported the project," he told the audience in Ramallah.

Kamran Elahian, an Iranian-American businessman who helped produce the Arabic-language version of the film, said its central theme remains relevant.

"The message [of the movie] is fresh. People should and will be affected by it."

But many of those who saw the film were unconvinced.

"There are too many differences," said 21-year-old Dea Opahi. "If we stopped resisting Israel, it would probably confiscate all the land left to us."

Mr Elhanian however believed Palestinians could follow Gandhi's example.

"Our dream is a year from now, we will have 5,000, no, 20,000 Gandhis. Young Gandhis. Palestinian Gandhis," he said.


"Our dream is a year from now, we will have 5,000, no, 20,000 Gandhis. Young Gandhis. Palestinian Gandhis" - Kamran Elahian

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/4419343.stm

Friday, March 25, 2005

Mahatma Gandhi, the Missing Laureate

by Oyvind Tonnesson
Nobel e-Museum Peace Editor, 1998-2000

Mohandas Gandhi (1869-1948) has become the strongest symbol of non-violence in the 20th century. It is widely held - in retrospect - that the Indian national leader should have been the very man to be selected for the Nobel Peace Prize. He was nominated several times, but was never awarded the prize. Why?

These questions have been asked frequently: Was the horizon of the Norwegian Nobel Committee too narrow? Were the committee members unable to appreciate the struggle for freedom among non-European peoples?" Or were the Norwegian committee members perhaps afraid to make a prize award which might be detrimental to the relationship between their own country and Great Britain?

When still alive, Mohandas Gandhi had many admirers, both in India and abroad. But his martyrdom in 1948 made him an even greater symbol of peace. Twenty-one years later, he was commemorated on this double-sized United Kingdom postage stamp.

Gandhi was nominated in 1937, 1938, 1939, 1947 and, finally, a few days before he was murdered in January 1948. The omission has been publicly regretted by later members of the Nobel Committee; when the Dalai Lama was awarded the Peace Prize in 1989, the chairman of the committee said that this was "in part a tribute to the memory of Mahatma Gandhi". However, the committee has never commented on the speculations as to why Gandhi was not awarded the prize, and until recently the sources which might shed some light on the matter were unavailable.

Mahatma Gandhi - Who was He?

Mohandas Karamchand - known as Mahatma or "Great-Souled" - Gandhi was born in Porbandar, the capital of a small principality in what is today the state of Gujarat in Western India, where his father was prime minister. His mother was a profoundly religious Hindu. She and the rest of the Gandhi family belonged to a branch of Hinduism in which non-violence and tolerance between religious groups were considered very important. His family background has later been seen as a very important explanation of why Mohandas Gandhi was able to achieve the position he held in Indian society. In the second half of the 1880s, Mohandas went to London where he studied law. After having finished his studies, he first went back to India to work as a barrister, and then, in 1893, to Natal in South Africa, where he was employed by an Indian trading company.

In South Africa Gandhi worked to improve living conditions for the Indian minority. This work, which was especially directed against increasingly racist legislation, made him develop a strong Indian and religious commitment, and a will to self-sacrifice. With a great deal of success he introduced a method of non-violence in the Indian struggle for basic human rights. The method, satyagraha - "truth force" - was highly idealistic; without rejecting the rule of law as a principle, the Indians should break those laws which were unreasonable or suppressive. Each individual would have to accept punishment for having violated the law. However, he should, calmly, yet with determination, reject the legitimacy of the law in question. This would, hopefully, make the adversaries - first the South African authorities, later the British in India - recognise the unlawfulness of their legislation.

When Gandhi came back to India in 1915, news of his achievements in South Africa had already spread to his home country. In only a few years, during the First World War, he became a leading figure in the Indian National Congress. Through the interwar period he initiated a series of non-violent campaigns against the British authorities. At the same time he made strong efforts to unite the Indian Hindus, Moslems and Christians, and struggled for the emancipation of the 'untouchables' in Hindu society. While many of his fellow Indian nationalists preferred the use of non-violent methods against the British primarily for tactical reasons, Gandhi's non-violence was a matter of principle. His firmness on that point made people respect him regardless of their attitude towards Indian nationalism or religion. Even the British judges who sentenced him to imprisonment recognised Gandhi as an exceptional personality.

The First Nomination for the Nobel Peace Prize

Among those who strongly admired Gandhi were the members of a network of pro-Gandhi "Friends of India" associations which had been established in Europe and the USA in the early 1930s. The Friends of India represented different lines of thought. The religious among them admired Gandhi for his piety. Others, anti-militarists and political radicals, were sympathetic to his philosophy of non-violence and supported him as an opponent of imperialism.

In 1937 a member of the Norwegian Storting (Parliament), Ole Colbjørnsen (Labour Party), nominated Gandhi for that year's Nobel Peace Prize, and he was duly selected as one of thirteen candidates on the Norwegian Nobel Committee's short list. Colbjornsen did not himself write the motivation for Gandhi's nomination; it was written by leading women of the Norwegian branch of "Friends of India", and its wording was of course as positive as could be expected.

The committee's adviser, professor Jacob Worm-Müller, who wrote a report on Gandhi, was much more critical. On the one hand, he fully understood the general admiration for Gandhi as a person: "He is, undoubtedly, a good, noble and ascetic person - a prominent man who is deservedly honoured and loved by the masses of India." On the other hand, when considering Gandhi as a political leader, the Norwegian professor's description was less favourable. There are, he wrote, "sharp turns in his policies, which can hardly be satisfactorily explained by his followers. (...) He is a freedom fighter and a dictator, an idealist and a nationalist. He is frequently a Christ, but then, suddenly, an ordinary politician."

Gandhi had many critics in the international peace movement. The Nobel Committee adviser referred to these critics in maintaining that he was not consistently pacifist, that he should have known that some of his non-violent campaigns towards the British would degenerate into violence and terror. This was something that had happened during the first Non-Cooperation Campaign in 1920-1921, e.g. when a crowd in Chauri Chaura, the United Provinces, attacked a police station, killed many of the policemen and then set fire to the police station.

A frequent criticism from non-Indians was also that Gandhi was too much of an Indian nationalist. In his report, Professor Worm-Muller expressed his own doubts as to whether Gandhi's ideals were meant to be universal or primarily Indian: "One might say that it is significant that his well-known struggle in South Africa was on behalf of the Indians only, and not of the blacks whose living conditions were even worse."

The name of the 1937 Nobel Peace Prize Laureate was to be Lord Cecil of Chelwood. We do not know whether the Norwegian Nobel Committee seriously considered awarding the Peace Prize to Gandhi that year, but it seems rather unlikely. Ole Colbjornsen renominated him both in 1938 and in 1939, but ten years were to pass before Gandhi made the committee's short list again.

1947: Victory and Defeat

In 1947 the nominations of Gandhi came by telegram from India, via the Norwegian Foreign Office. The nominators were B.G. Kher, Prime Minister of Bombay, Govindh Bhallabh Panth, Premier of United Provinces, and Mavalankar, the President of the Indian Legislative Assembly. Their arguments in support of his candidacy were written in telegram style, like the one from Govind Bhallabh Panth: "Recommend for this year Nobel Prize Mahatma Gandhi architect of the Indian nation the greatest living exponent of the moral order and the most effective champion of world peace today." There were to be six names on the Nobel Committee's short list, Mohandas Gandhi was one of them.

The Nobel Committee's adviser, the historian Jens Arup Seip, wrote a new report which is primarily an account of Gandhi's role in Indian political history after 1937. "The following ten years," Seip wrote, "from 1937 up to 1947, led to the event which for Gandhi and his movement was at the same time the greatest victory and the worst defeat - India's independence and India's partition." The report describes how Gandhi acted in the three different, but mutually related conflicts which the Indian National Congress had to handle in the last decade before independence: the struggle between the Indians and the British; the question of India's participation in the Second World War; and, finally, the conflict between Hindu and Moslem communities. In all these matters, Gandhi had consistently followed his own principles of non-violence.

The Seip report was not critical towards Gandhi in the same way as the report written by Worm-Muller ten years earlier. It was rather favourable, yet not explicitly supportive. Seip also wrote briefly on the ongoing separation of India and the new Moslem state, Pakistan, and concluded - rather prematurely it would seem today: "It is generally considered, as expressed for example in The Times of 15 August 1947, that if 'the gigantic surgical operation' constituted by the partition of India, has not led to bloodshed of much larger dimensions, Gandhi's teachings, the efforts of his followers and his own presence, should get a substantial part of the credit."

The partition of India in 1947 led to a process which we today probably would describe as "ethnic cleansing". Hundreds of thousands of people were massacred and millions had to move; Moslems from India to Pakistan, Hindus in the opposite direction.

Having read the report, the members of the Norwegian Nobel Committee must have felt rather updated on the last phase of the Indian struggle for independence. However, the Nobel Peace Prize had never been awarded for that sort of struggle. The committee members also had to consider the following issues: Should Gandhi be selected for being a symbol of non-violence, and what political effects could be expected if the Peace Prize was awarded to the most prominent Indian leader - relations between India and Pakistan were far from developing peacefully during the autumn of 1947?

From the diary of committee chairman Gunnar Jahn, we now know that when the members were to make their decision on October 30, 1947, two acting committee members, the Christian conservative Herman Smitt Ingebretsen and the Christian liberal Christian Oftedal spoke in favour of Gandhi. One year earlier, they had strongly favoured John Mott, the YMCA leader. It seems that they generally preferred candidates who could serve as moral and religious symbols in a world threatened by social and ideological conflicts. However, in 1947 they were not able to convince the three other members. The Labour politician Martin Tranmael was very reluctant to award the Prize to Gandhi in the midst of the Indian-Pakistani conflict, and former Foreign Minister Birger Braadland agreed with Tranmael. Gandhi was, they thought, too strongly committed to one of the belligerents. In addition both Tranmael and Jahn had learnt that, one month earlier, at a prayer-meeting, Gandhi had made a statement which indicated that he had given up his consistent rejection of war. Based on a telegram from Reuters, The Times, on September 27, 1947, under the headline "Mr. Gandhi on 'war' with Pakistan" reported:

"Mr. Gandhi told his prayer meeting to-night that, though he had always opposed all warfare, if there was no other way of securing justice from Pakistan and if Pakistan persistently refused to see its proved error and continued to minimise it, the Indian Union Government would have to go to war against it. No one wanted war, but he could never advise anyone to put up with injustice. If all Hindus were annihilated for a just cause he would not mind. If there was war, the Hindus in Pakistan could not be fifth columnists. If their loyalty lay not with Pakistan they should leave it. Similarly Muslims whose loyalty was with Pakistan should not stay in the Indian Union."

Gandhi saw "no place for him in a new order where they wanted an army, a navy, an air force and what not". In the picture, Gandhi's spiritual heir, Prime Minister Pandit Nehru, Defense Minister Sardar Baldev Singh, and the Commanders-in-Chief of the three Services, are inspecting a Guard of Honour at the Red Fort, Delhi, in August, 1948. Fifty years later, both India and Pakistan had developed and tested their own nuclear weapons.

Gandhi had immediately stated that the report was correct, but incomplete. At the meeting he had added that he himself had not changed his mind and that "he had no place in a new order where they wanted an army, a navy, an air force and what not".

Both Jahn and Tranmael knew that the first report had not been complete, but they had become very doubtful. Jahn in his diary quoted himself as saying: "While it is true that he (Gandhi) is the greatest personality among the nominees - plenty of good things could be said about him - we should remember that he is not only an apostle for peace; he is first and foremost a patriot. (...) Moreover, we have to bear in mind that Gandhi is not naive. He is an excellent jurist and a lawyer." It seems that the Committee Chairman suspected Gandhi's statement one month earlier to be a deliberate step to deter Pakistani aggression. Three of five members thus being against awarding the 1947 Prize to Gandhi, the Committee unanimously decided to award it to the Quakers.

1948: A Posthumous Award Considered

Mahatma Gandhi was assassinated on 30 January 1948, two days before the closing date for that year's Nobel Peace Prize nominations. The Committee received six letters of nomination naming Gandhi; among the nominators were the Quakers and Emily Greene Balch, former Laureates. For the third time Gandhi came on the Committee's short list - this time the list only included three names - and Committee adviser Seip wrote a report on Gandhi's activities during the last five months of his life. He concluded that Gandhi, through his course of life, had put his profound mark on an ethical and political attitude which would prevail as a norm for a large number of people both inside and outside India: "In this respect Gandhi can only be compared to the founders of religions."

Nobody had ever been awarded the Nobel Peace Prize posthumously. But according to the statutes of the Nobel Foundation in force at that time, the Nobel Prizes could, under certain circumstances, be awarded posthumously. Thus it was possible to give Gandhi the prize. However, Gandhi did not belong to an organisation, he left no property behind and no will; who should receive the Prize money? The Director of the Norwegian Nobel Institute, August Schou, asked another of the Committee's advisers, lawyer Ole Torleif Roed, to consider the practical consequences if the Committee were to award the Prize posthumously. Røed suggested a number of possible solutions for general application. Subsequently, he asked the Swedish prize-awarding institutions for their opinion. The answers were negative; posthumous awards, they thought, should not take place unless the laureate died after the Committee's decision had been made.

On November 18, 1948, the Norwegian Nobel Committee decided to make no award that year on the grounds that "there was no suitable living candidate". Chairman Gunnar Jahn wrote in his diary: "To me it seems beyond doubt that a posthumous award would be contrary to the intentions of the testator." According to the chairman, three of his colleagues agreed in the end, only Mr. Oftedal was in favour of a posthumous award to Gandhi.

Later, there have been speculations that the committee members could have had another deceased peace worker than Gandhi in mind when they declared that there was "no suitable living candidate", namely the Swedish UN envoy to Palestine, Count Bernadotte, who was murdered in September 1948. Today, this can be ruled out; Bernadotte had not been nominated in 1948. Thus it seems reasonable to assume that Gandhi would have been invited to Oslo to receive the Nobel Peace Prize had he been alive one more year.

Why Was Gandhi Never Awarded the Nobel Peace Prize?

Up to 1960, the Nobel Peace Prize was awarded almost exclusively to Europeans and Americans. In retrospect, the horizon of the Norwegian Nobel Committee may seem too narrow. Gandhi was very different from earlier Laureates. He was no real politician or proponent of international law, not primarily a humanitarian relief worker and not an organiser of international peace congresses. He would have belonged to a new breed of Laureates.

There is no hint in the archives that the Norwegian Nobel Committee ever took into consideration the possibility of an adverse British reaction to an award to Gandhi. Thus it seems that the hypothesis that the Committee's omission of Gandhi was due to its members' not wanting to provoke British authorities, may be rejected.

In 1947 the conflict between India and Pakistan and Gandhi's prayer-meeting statement, which made people wonder whether he was about to abandon his consistent pacifism, seem to have been the primary reasons why he was not selected by the committee's majority. Unlike the situation today, there was no tradition for the Norwegian Nobel Committee to try to use the Peace Prize as a stimulus for peaceful settlement of regional conflicts.

During the last months of his life, Gandhi worked hard to end the violence between Hindus and Moslems which followed the partition of India. We know little about the Norwegian Nobel Committee's discussions on Gandhi's candidature in 1948 - other than the above quoted entry of November 18 in Gunnar Jahn's diary - but it seems clear that they seriously considered a posthumous award. When the committee, for formal reasons, ended up not making such an award, they decided to reserve the prize, and then, one year later, not to spend the prize money for 1948 at all. What many thought should have been Mahatma Gandhi's place on the list of Laureates was silently but respectfully left open.

http://nobelprize.org/peace/articles/gandhi/

Saturday, March 19, 2005

Gandhi's 1930 march re-enacted

The following is an excerpt from a BBC report re Mahatma Gandhi, revered for leading India to independence, and the thousands who turned out for the re-enactment of the famous "salt march" that took place 75 years ago.

_40918449_statue203longafp.jpg

The famous 1930 "salt march" by India's independence hero Mahatma Gandhi to defy British colonial rule is being re-enacted for its 75th anniversary. The march of several hundred is led by Gandhi's great-grandson Tushar Gandhi.

Mahatma Gandhi undertook the 24-day walk from Ahmedabad to the coastal village of Dandi to manufacture salt. It sparked India's civil disobedience movement as thousands joined him on the beach to pick up salt, the production of which was under government control.

The Italian-born president of India's governing Congress Party, Sonia Gandhi, launched the march in a ceremony at Sabarmati Ashram, once Mahatma Gandhi's commune in Ahmedabad, Gujarat.

The BBC's Sanjeev Srivastava said the ceremony was solemn, almost subdued, and was interspersed with the independence leader's favourite prayers.

Mrs Gandhi urged those carrying out the 380km (240 miles) to take forward Mahatma Gandhi's message of "peace and non-violence".

Few similarities

Mahatma Gandhi's aim at the end of the Dandi walk was to manufacture salt and defy the monopoly on salt production by the British colonial rulers. The unique, non-violent protest forced the British to take note of the growing civil disobedience movement in the country.

Mahatma's great-grandson Tushar and several hundred fellow marches will follow the same route and take a similar length of time to walk it. But there the similarities with the 1930 march end, says our correspondent.

The values that Mahatma Gandhi lived and died for - such as non-violence, religious tolerance and honesty in public life - are as alien to today's India as the days of the Raj, says our correspondent.

Gandhi was known for his simple ways, but the sequel march was something of an extravaganza.

Saturday's march was attended by nearly half of the Indian cabinet, many of whom walked for a few kilometres before returning to their hotels, our correspondent observed.

Tushar Gandhi acknowledged there was little to compare his march to his great-grandfather's, although he said they carried the same message of religious harmony, brotherhood and peace.

"The comparison is that all the Dandi walkers who have come from all over the world are volunteers. They came... because they identified with this battle and I think that is the spirit," he told the BBC.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/3576420.stm
- - -

Mahatma Gandhi's fading dream

Further reading:

3 September, 2004: BBC Restoring Gandhi's African legacy - "Gandhi did not want to impose his leadership on them. He felt that Africans should carry out their own struggle. In fact, many African National Congress leaders have given credit for Mahatma for being their source of inspiration."

31 March, 2004: BBC Mahatma Gandhi's fading dream - excerpts:

Birth place of Mahatma Gandhi

Porbandar on India's west coast is famous for being the birthplace of India's independence leader Mahatma Gandhi.

Sadly, many of Gandhi's dreams have disappeared.

There is another facet of Gandhi's vision which has disappeared from the land of his birth.

He believed in economic self-reliance, with the village as the centre of economic production.

That ideal appears to have disappeared in the smoke that belches out of the cement and soda-ash factories that dot Porbandar.
- - -

"Gandhi's economic vision was only appropriate for his time," says the BJP's Babubhai Bokadia.

"If we follow it now we will be left behind. No-one can be self-sufficient anymore. The world is linked economically whether we like it or not."

Not surprisingly, these thoughts are echoed by his rival, Vithalbhai Radadiya of the Congress Party.

"Why should our villages be left behind? Villagers are consumers too.

"Mahatma Gandhi's vision has to be modernised and taken forward."
- - -

"His ideas were very lofty and completely impractical," says Narottam Liladhar, who owns a tiny shop in the nearby market square.

"The world does not recognise anything other than strength and power. Non-violence may have delivered for us in the past but it is completely useless today."
- - -

Mr Ranija, now in his sixties, was a young boy when Gandhi was alive and led India to freedom from colonial rule.

"He certainly did a lot for us back then," the jeweller says, as he polishes a gold ring.

"But his ideals were only appropriate at the time. Non-violence got rid of the British but it will have very little effect in today's world.

"With all the terrorism one sees and with the tension that flares up often on our borders we cannot sit back and do nothing. We have to protect ourselves."

Thursday, December 30, 2004

World Citizens Party - The Association of World Citizens

World Citizens Party, initiated in 1975, The Association of World Citizens (AWC) is an international peace organization with World Citizen Centers established in 50 countries. NGO status with the UN, including consultative status with ECOSOC

The goal is working with people, progressive governments, and international institutions to create a Global Village of lasting peace, social and economic justice, and the foundation for a new civilization based on respect for life and the environment. The key to achieve this goal is for people to think and act as responsible Citizens of the World.

World Citizenship is not a replacement for national citizenship, but rather a new responsibility in this interdependent world to work together across national boundaries to secure our common fate.

AWC is working with people, progressive governments, and international institutions to help create a democratic world community with global governance capable of maintaining lasting peace and justice through international law. The key to achieve this goal is for people to think and act as responsible Citizens of the World.

"The age of nations is past, the task before us now, if we are to survive is to shake off our ancient prejudices, and build the earth." - Teilhard de Chardin

I am a citizen, not of Athens, or Greece, but of the world."
- Socrates (5th Century B.C.)

ASSOCIATION OF WORLD CITIZENS WORKING TOGETHER TO BUILD A WORLD COMMUNITY

AWC Goals and Programs

ERADICATION OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS: A top priority is the complete elimination of nuclear weapons from the face of the earth with legal constraints to ensure they can never be built again. There can be no security until this goal is attained. There are 30,000 nuclear weapons stockpiled in this third year of the new millennium. Moreover, thousands of U.S. and Russian nuclear warheads are on a hair-trigger alert, ready for launch in a few minutes notice. The immediate task is for all nuclear warheads to be taken off hair-trigger alert status. This would eliminate the possibility of nuclear war through an accidental missile launch or miscalculation and the subsequent destruction of both the United States and Russia within an hour. The elimination of nuclear weapons will lead to the eradication of all weapons of mass destruction.

THE WAR SYSTEM: The goal is the elimination of the war system itself, with future conflicts between peoples and nations to be settled through the framework of world law under the jurisdiction of a much strengthened, democratic, representative, and reformed United Nations. There is no alternative to perpetual war, leading to an ultimate disaster for humanity, or the constant preparation for war, with all the economic, political, and cultural elements that support and rely on the war system. An immediate task is to stop the militarization of space, which would turn the heavens above into a new terrorism for humanity below, and make disarmament steps more difficult, if not impossible.

"Abolition of war is no longer an ethical question to be pondered solely by learned philosophers and ecclesiastics, but a hard core one for the decision of the masses whose survival is the issue. Many will tell you with mockery and ridicule that the abolition of war can only be a dream.that it is the vague imagining of a visionary. But we must go on or we will go under! We must have new thoughts, new ideas, new concepts. We must break out of the strait jacket of the past. We must have sufficient imagination and courage to translate the universal wish for peace - which is rapidly becoming a universal necessity - into actuality."

"The very triumph of scientific annihilation has destroyed the possibility of war being a medium of practical settlement of international differences. If you lose, you are annihilated. If you win, you stand only to lose. War contains the germs of double suicide. Military alliances, balances of power, leagues of nations all in turn have failed. We have our last chance. If we will not devise some greater and more equitable system, Armageddon will be at our door."
- General Douglas MacArthur

GLOBALIZATION: Globalization can be a step toward a progressive world community. However, this term has been co-opted by those whose goal is a world ruled by a few powerful nations, their corporations, an elite rich minority, and backed by the massive military power of the United States. This is essentially a de facto world government. It is the antithesis of democracy; moreover, corporate economic globalization is a disaster for our planet because this system is dependent on constantly expanding markets and mass consumption, which inevitably leads to a polluted and resource depleted planet. Corporate globalization has also widened the shameful gap between rich and poor.

Globalization must be democratic and beneficial to all the people rather than the few. And it must include both social and economic justice. Today, only 20 percent of the world's population has more wealth than the remaining 80 percent. Moreover, this rich 20 percent consume over 80 percent of the world's resources. There is no possibility to establish democracy and a peaceful world under this gross disparity of wealth.

THE UN AND CIVIL SOCIETY:

"We seek to strengthen the United Nations, to help solve its financial problems, to make it a more effective instrument for peace, to develop it into a genuine world security system.capable of resolving disputes on the basis of law, of insuring the security of the large and the small, and of creating conditions under which arms can finally be abolished. The will requires a new effort to achieve world law."
- President John Kennedy

REFORM AND DEMOCRATIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS, a "Third Generation UN" as former UN Secretary General Boutros Boutros-Ghali terms it, must include direct representation of people. In cooperation with the Campaign for a More Democratic UN (CAMDUN), AWC actively works for the inclusion of a Peoples Assembly within the UN system, which is possible under Article 22 of the UN Charter. One concept is a two-tier parliament as suggested by former UN Secretary General Perez de Cuellar. One tier would be the General Assembly of nations, and the second tier comprised of civil society, perhaps represented by NGOs.

OPTIONS FOR A PEOPLES ASSEMBLY (CAMDUM)

WORLD CITIZEN ASSEMBLY (WCA): Eleven WCAs have been held to date. The locations included Tokyo, Hiroshima, Paris, Los Angeles, San Francisco, and several in New York City. The latest Assembly was held in Taipei, Taiwan in April of 2001. More than 400 delegates from 52 countries attended. These meetings bring together peace activists from around the world to initiate coordinated global action programs. The next WCA is scheduled for San Francisco in late 2004.

WORLD CITIZENSHIP DAY CELEBRATION: The first World Citizenship Day Celebration was held in San Francisco on March 20, 2000. The second celebration was held during WCA 2001 in Taiwan and attended by 20,000 people and 3,000 performers in Taipei Stadium. This is an annual event.

"And so, my fellow Americans: ask not what your country can do for you - ask what you can do for your country. My fellow citizens of the world: ask not what America will do for you, but what together we can do for the freedom of man."
- John F. Kennedy Inaugural address, 1961

STUDENTS FOR PEACE: An active program reaching out to students to work for peace on the local and global level as responsible citizens of the world. This includes a curriculum for students in high school and above to study conflict resolution, the United Nations, and other crucial issues.

The Global Village is not a dream; it is imperative if humankind is to survive. In 1989, UNESCO officially adopted a study on human violence entitled the Seville Statement. This study by prominent scientists, academics, and other intellectuals from around the world concluded that war is not inherent in human beings. The violence of war is learned and passed on from generation to generation. The Seville Statement concluded: "Since wars begin in the minds of men, so peace also begins in our minds. The same species that invented war is capable of inventing peace. The responsibility lies within each of us.

"We have flown the air like birds and swum the sea like fishes, but have yet to learn the simple act of walking the earth together as brothers." - Martin Luther King Jr.

"World federation is an ideal that will not die. More and more people are coming to realize that peace must be more than an interlude if we are to survive; that people is a produce of law and order; that law is essential if the force of arms is not to rule the world." - William O. Douglas - Supreme Court Justice

"Only with a burning patience can we conquer the Splendid city that will give light, justice and dignity to all mankind" - Rimbaud

BECOME A WORLD CITIZEN TODAY AND BE PART OF THIS GREAT MOVEMENT TO CREATE A BETTER WORLD FOR THE 21ST CENTURY

The Association of World Citizens
55 New Montgomery Street, Suite 224
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone: (415) 541-9610
Fax: (650) 745-0640
Email address is: info@worldcitizens.org

Proposals for democratic strengthening of the UN system of global governance - A UN Citizens' Assembly

CAMDUN - Interactive proposals, ideas and activities for democratic strengthening of the UN system of global governance:

• (1) UN draft proposal for a Civil Society Forum linked with the General Assembly
• (2) Qs and As on a Civil Society Forum
• (3) A UN Citizens' Assembly
• (4) Action for UN Renewal
• (5) Initiative for a New Zealand Forum for UN Renewal
• (6) Inaugural Meeting, March 1997, of New Zealand's Forum for UN Renewal
• (7) Survey of UK opinion on a Civil Society Forum linked with the General Assembly

(3) A UN CITIZENS' ASSEMBLY
(Dr. Harry H. Lerner, CAMDUN's UN Representative and President of the Communications Coordination Committee for the United Nations (CCC/UN) 301 East 45th Street, New York, NY 10017, USA.)

The "Dynamics of Democracy--Local to Global" flow-chart below is a diagrammatic description of a permanent process of community-level NGO and CBO (Community-based organization) coordination for cooperative planning and problem-solving via monthly meetings of organizational representatives, computer networking, bio-regional coalition-building and public education on the linkage between local and global issues and strategies. One unifying aim and ongoing project of such community councils is participation in the biennial nomination and popular election of, as well as continuing communication with, delegates to the proposed United Nations Citizens (Peoples') Assembly, each representing their area's residents as global inhabitants, as well as national citizens. The resulting UN body would number under 600 delegates, on a proportionally equitable population basis. This plan involves a minimum of 1 delegate per nation plus the square root of the millions of its population. (16=U.S.; 26=India; 32=China.)


fchart1.gif


The original proposal for an elected UN Second (Peoples) Assembly was initially submitted at the UN General Assembly's Special Session on Disarmament II,in 1982 by the Medical Association for Prevention of War's delegate, Dr. Jeffrey Segall. He was the founding Editor of Medicine and War, the journal of the UK affiliate of the International Physicians for Prevention of Nuclear War. It was then also presented to an evening session of the Peoples Assembly for the UNSSD II, convened by the World Citizens Assembly's UN representative, Dr.Harry Lerner. The unanimous endorsement, which followed, encouraged Dr. Segall to propose forming the International Network for a UN Second Assembly (INFUSA) in 1983. He invited Dr.Lerner and a dozen other global convenors to enlist broad support from the world-wide NGO community, key UN officials and the UN General Assembly. (See Building a More Democratic United Nations, 1991, pp. 93-115)

After six years of global organizing, INFUSA undertook a series of five annual international Conferences For A More Democratic UN, three in cooperation with the Association of World Citizens. At the UN-based, third day of the 1993 conference, the delegates voted to incorporate INFUSA into CAMDUN, the present Campaign for A More Democratic UN. This fourth CAMDUN Conference also approved the formation of a world-wide network of NGOs to promote public participation in global governance through a strengthened and more democratic United Nations.

The 5th CAMDUN Conference, October 6-9, 1995, in NYC, submitted an innovative Statement to the UN General Assembly's President and its high-level Working Group on Revitalizing and Reforming the UN System. The Convenors also requested the appointment of a sub„committee to consider peoples' representation at the UN. This was essentially the same request submitted by INFUSA annually from 1984 to 1989. The recent flood of endorsements of a UN Peoples' Assembly by UN, diplomatic and NGO leaders may imply that this needed evolutionary change is at hand.

For example, the President of the UN Economic and Social Council convened a meeting of 100 NGO Representatives on December 9, 1996, to explore methods of enhancing NGO involvement in the work of the General Assembly. Our preceding "sub-committee proposal" was endorsed by the ECOSOC President and recommended to the General Assembly President, who accepted it. Thus, a sub-committee of the High-Level, Open-Ended Working Group on Strengthening and Reforming the UN System, initially open to NGO participation, is currently in operation.

The "Dynamics of Democracy" process, outlined above, would combine the benefits of democratic leadership development, information and resource sharing, and cooperative decision-making in community problem-solving and local election of delegates to the proposed UN Peoples Assembly.

This global process would also permit representation, as planetary citizens, of the 1/18th of the human race known as the "indigenous peoples" who are currently unrepresented at the United Nations. Furthermore, such a UN Peoples or Citizens Assembly, linked to its local constituents electronically and through the network of ongoing community coordinating councils, could significantly contribute to peace and security through:

• Providing "early warning" of intensifying tensions and impending conflicts;
• Contributing to conflict prevention and resolution efforts, in cooperation with local authorities, academic institutions, proposed UN conflict settlement machinery, etc.;
• Monitoring compliance with UN agreements, conventions and codes of conduct;
• Facilitating global NGO collaboration with UN agencies;
• Serving as a source of helpful insights and initiatives for the UN Principal Organs, Specialized Agencies and Member States.

The foregoing and other benefits of the proposed local-to-global approach to a more democratic UN can also help "evolve" the UN Charter, without requiring its amendment. For example, the proposed UN Citizens Assembly can be established by the General Assembly, under Charter Article 22, or by any of the Principal Organs under Article 7.2.

As a "Subsidiary Organ", the proposed Citizens Assembly would function "at the pleasure" and in the service of the sponsoring Principal Organ. Thus, under the General Assembly, such service would aim to facilitate enhancement, communication and implementation of the GA Resolutions.

The local-to-global process of civic involvement and delegate selection, recommended above, would promote "Subsidiarity" -- the principle of direct decision-making at the most individual level feasible. This process would also promote participation of the citizenry in NGOs and CBOs as well as the volunteering of the best qualified to represent "major groups" in community councils and other civic bodies, above all, as popularly elected delegates of their districts to the United Nations.

People’s Assembly: A Voice for Civil Society - United Nations Associations

The following is a copy in full of [insert link] for future reference.

People's Assembly

People’s Assembly: A Voice for Civil Society

People's Assembly
I. Mission of UNA is to support the principles & programs of the UN

A. Build support amongst the people. Critical 2 success of UN
B. Not where people's voice heard, so there is need for PA
C. Some say UN representatives represent the people, but since they are appointed by governments, there are political interests in the way
D. How, then, is the voice of the people heard? How does the United Nations achieve its vision of a more peaceful world for the people when the people themselves do not get a say in what they believe would be best for them? ….
E. Clearly, the United Nations, then, is in need of some kind of body where talk would be geared away from political interests and considerations, and more towards the best interest of civilians.

II. Would be a committee affiliated with UN, but not with govt's (NGO)

A. CAMDUN (Campaign 4 A Democratic UN) suggestions for how the organization would be laid out. (http://www.camdun-online.gn.apc.org/options.html#ngo)

B. Other efforts

1. Millenium Forum - 2000 - held by UN to collect thoughts of people and NGO's about such an org.

2. ACGC (Action Coalition 4 Global Change) - 1995 - held United People's Assembly to show how such a body would work

3. MPAN (Millennium People's Assembly Network) - 1998 - to coordinate the movement

a. formed Global People's Assembly

i. vision statement - "To provide means through which the world's people can actively participate in making decisions about issues affecting our lives and the well being of our planet."

III. UNA & whatever official "PA" comes about must join to coordinate efforts to make an impact
       A. While PA would be a forum, UNA would be essential 2 create support

Conclusion: Whether as a side agency or a main body like Gen. Assembly, it is needed.

GPA Preamble to the Charter - "We each claim the freedom, right, and responsibility, as citizens of the world, both to speak in our own voices and to encourage and enable everyone everywhere to speak decisively on issues that concern us all." 

People’s Assembly: A Voice for Civil Society

by Mona Parsa January 26, 2003

UNA-OC

Responsibility of creating a world in which people live together in peace and agreement is upon those who wish to live in such a place. It is essential for human beings to take action in realizing their hopes in achieving a better world to live. Many attempts have been made in order for the nations of the world to harmonize their efforts; some of these attempts have failed, such as the League of Nations, while others, like the United Nations, are determined to achieve their goal of peace and security throughout the globe. But the problem is exactly that: ‘attempts have been made in order for the nations of the world to harmonize their efforts,’ not the people. True, the member states of the United Nations represent the people, but the representatives are political individuals who cannot help but be motivated by political interests; they are not regular citizens who are essentially motivated by their well-being. How, then, is the voice of the people heard? How does the United Nations achieve its vision of a more peaceful world for the people when the people themselves do not get a say in what they believe would be best for them? Clearly, the United Nations, then, is in need of some kind of body where talk would be geared away from political interests and considerations, and more towards the best interest of civilians.

The Vision

An assembly of nation representatives whom are more or less associated with the governments of the nations, the United Nations was established in 1945 with 51 nations signing to the charter. Over 50 years later, there are 191 member states, all united and devoted to maintaining peace, security, freedom, and cooperation and committed to keeping the United Nations a hub for synchronizing the nations’ measures in attaining these goals. The preamble to the UN Charter begins with the words “We the Peoples…,” implying that the sole purpose of becoming members to the United Nations is to serve its citizenry. Clearly, creating a peaceful world would benefit all mankind, but with political interests in the way, how can the UN clearly see what the people, who the nations are serving, are concerned about?

It follows that a committee composed of individuals from organizations not affiliated with the government would be valuable. Many have sensed the need for such a forum or institution, even back when the UN was established: “In 1945, when the United Nations was founded, Ernest Bevin said in the British House of Commons that ‘there should be a study of a house directly elected by the people of the world to whom the nations are accountable’” (Brief History). More recently, others who have expressed interest on the topic include the UN Secretary-General himself, Kofi Annan. At the fifty-seventh session of the General Assembly in September of 2002, a main issue in Kofi Annan’s agenda included ideas to strengthen the United Nations by better coordinating things between the UN and civil society. In Section IV of his report, titled Working Better Together, Annan recognized that “in every country in which the United Nations operates, its overarching purpose is to serve its people.” Annan went on to address Non-governmental Organizations:

Thousands of non-governmental organizations now have formal consultative status. Their contribution has enriched the debates and influenced the outcome of many intergovernmental deliberations…I will establish a panel of eminent persons to review the relationship between the United Nations and civil society and offer practical recommendations for improved modalities of interaction.

(24-25)

Clearly, the need for some form of institution for the “people” is existent and rising.

What Has Been Done

CAMDUN (Campaign for a Democratic United Nations) is amongst the many organizations working toward a body that would represent civil society. Established in 1989 as a project of the International Network for a UN Second Assembly (INFUSA), it has arranged several options as to how an assembly for the people directly tied to the United Nations would be laid out. The following is a summary of its detailed list on their website (www.camdun-online.gn.apc.org):

TABLE 1

CAMDUN’s Main Options for a UN People’s Assembly

1.      UN Second Assembly
• Seats allocated proportionately to population size
• Would represent the peoples of the United Nations as global inhabitants and members of civil society, while the delegates in the General Assembly would continue to represent us as national citizens

2.      UN Citizens’ Assembly
• Direct election of delegates by community councils

3.   UN Parliamentary Assembly
• Direct election of delegates
• People would be represented in this assembly as supporters of democratic political parties

4.   UN Civil Society Assembly
• Each participating country would have up to 6 delegates

ANY OF THE FOUR OPTIONS ABOVE COULD QUALIFY AS A SUBSIDIARY ORGAN OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY

5.   UN NGO Assembly
• Open to delegates representing UN-accredited NGOs

6.   UN Civil Society Forum
• Consists of representatives of organizations accredited to the General Assembly as Civil Society Organizations

7.   NGO Worldwide Net
• Would create a worldwide network of NGOs which are associated with the UN DPI (Department of Public Information)
• Objective is to enhance UN/NGO cooperation

Other efforts have been made towards establishing an institution for the voice of civil society in the United Nations. At the fifty-second session of the General Assembly of the United Nations, Annan stated: “If the United Nations is to continue to play a vital role in the century ahead, it is imperative that it benefit from the imagination and engage the support of the world's people. [The Secretary-General] has therefore proposed that non-governmental organizations and other civil society actors organize a Millennium Forum in connection with the Millennium Assembly, perhaps immediately preceding it” (United Nations Reform). Held in May 2000, the forum was a form of preparation for the UN Millennium Assembly later in the year. It collected thoughts and proposals of NGOs and civil society about their future and about a creation of an “organizational structure whereby the peoples of the world can participate effectively in global decision-making” (GPA Presence).

Others who have taken steps in making “the people’s” voice heard include the Action Coalition for Global Change, which held a United People’s Assembly in 1995 at the 50th anniversary of the United Nations. The ACGC hoped “to show how such a body could fulfill the ‘We the Peoples’ mandate of the U.N. Charter” (Brief History).

Certainly, the event must have had some influence, for a network to coordinate the expanding movement was established at the UN NGO meeting in 1998: The Millennium People’s Assembly Network. MPAN is a coalition of organizations and people focused on forming an institution which would be affiliated with the United Nations and would address the “basic human needs which cross all political boundaries” (About MPAN). As mentioned in the “Brief History of the People’s Assembly Movement,” the Hague Appeal for Peace took place in 1999, with participants from people’s assemblies across the globe coming together to form a permanent institution. Just one year later, about 150 people from around the world attended the first “Global People’s Assembly” in Samoa, creating the vision statement: To provide means through which the world’s people can actively participate in making decisions about issues affecting our lives and the well being of our planet. The founding meeting in Samoa also resulted in an unfixed charter and the awarding of India to host the next GPA meeting in 2002.

With the establishment of a Global People’s Assembly, the movement of civil society representation in the United Nations has gained momentum. As mentioned in an email from Rob Wheeler, a GPA supporter, those who advocate the Global People’s Assembly believe that UN representatives, whom are appointed by the government, do not well represent the people, as the people are not asked about issues that are discussed at the UN and the representatives are appointed by the government. Wheeler also referred to the fact that some people believe the People’s Assembly “should be a second house at the United Nations – directly elected by the people of the world. Others believe it should be independent of the UN. Some think it would be much more democratic than the UN and that the UN should thus be answerable to this elected peoples assembly or world parliament.” The GPA may very well be the “official” institution that people have hoped for in providing a place for their voices to be heard.

So where, then, do the United Nations Associations of the world fit in this evolving movement? Established in 1946, many could say that the World Federation of United Nations Associations (WFUNA) was the first NGO to devote their efforts to such a movement, and so with its knowledge and experience, would be the ideal institution that civil society needs to give a voice to their needs. With so many other movements throughout the world, it is necessary to coordinate efforts into one body in order to make an impact, just as the 51 member states in 1945 did. Therefore, it is essential for the WFUNA and the Global People’s Assembly to cooperate and join into one body, making it a stronger institution in furthering their mission. In addition, the world’s UNAs are essential in creating and sustaining public support for whatever institution becomes the official people’s assembly. They are a critical part of the movement, as their initial objective of building public support for the United Nations and their efforts is crucial, since many of the UN’s recent efforts have been geared towards collaboration with civil society.

Conclusion

It is imperative for people to take action to live in a secure and stable world instead of letting others deal with the situation for them. Only the people themselves know what is best for their well-being, and so they must rise to the occasion, involving themselves in the process of incubating a world where men would live together in harmony and accord. As stated in the Preamble to the Charter of the Global People’s Assembly, “We each claim the freedom, right, and responsibility, as citizens of the world, both to speak in our own voices and to encourage and enable everyone everywhere to speak decisively on issues that concern us all.”  In addition, in the movement to give people a voice toward creating a positive future, the WFUNA states its objective in its Constitution:

Whereas the peoples of the United Nations, through their governments, have declared that they are determined to make a better world for its people to live in …We, the representatives of the United Nations Associations in our respective countries, believing that since wars begin in the minds of men, it is in the minds of men that the defenses of peace must be constructed…have resolved to combine our efforts to form an association of the peoples…” (Preamble)

The movement towards a permanent institution to give a voice for society’s call for well-being would have less of a political standpoint in world affairs than the current United Nations. Primarily concerned with serving world citizens, a “People’s Assembly” would be a useful appendage for the United Nations. Associated with the people in a non-political way, it can give a clear view on topics and provide useful advice for situations to the General Assembly since political interests are not an issue with NGOs. As a side council, it would be amongst the dozens of other UN divisions associated with human rights. Like the UNHCR, with a specialty of dealing with refugee situations, the People’s Assembly would specialize and be an advocate for the people and their natural rights and well-being. As ancient Greeks believed, the value of an individual is high, and emphasis on their participation in society is vital. Whatever shape, form, or name a permanent people’s assembly would take, it is certainly essential for people to take action in having a hand in shaping their future.

Wednesday, October 06, 2004

Peace event for John Lennon - by Yoko Ono February 2003

The following piece, authored by Yoko Ono and dated February 2003, I have copied from AIU website for future reference and as a note to myself to write a post marking the date of John Lennon's birthday.

Here is the Peace event for John Lennon by Yoko Ono in February 2003:

This is a call for all countries and their people who wish for World Peace. You, the carrier of good tidings, be proud, swift and wise. By being in peace, you are already part of the peaceful world.

A: VIP (Visit In Peace) Event

Visit:
Visit the Middle East.
Visit Asia.
Visit Africa.
Visit countries in the Southern Hemisphere.
Visit countries in the Northern Hemisphere.

Take:
Take photos of your friends who wish to make the trip but cannot.
Take music and/or an instrument from your country.
Take one thing you wear often and give it to somebody you meet there.
What you give could be
As small as a handkerchief.
As useful as a T-shirt.
As pretty as a necklace.

Watch:
a) Watch the sunrise and compare it with the ones at home.
b) Watch the sunset and compare it with the ones at home.
c) Watch the moonlight and compare it with the ones at home.

Stay:
a) Stay until you find a friend to talk to.
b) Stay until you start to appreciate the country.
c) Stay until you start to feel love for their children.

Wish:
Make a wish and hold it in your heart.
Deliver a wish and see it unfold.
Send a wish and ask it to be shared.

Bring:
Bring back something you bought there.
Bring back memories.
Bring back a smile.

B: HIP (Home In Peace) Event
For those who cannot make the trip:

Visit:
In your mind
In your heart
In your dream

Pen pal:
Make pen pals in countries you've never been to.
Ask your friends to do the same.
Make pen pals in troubled countries.
Ask your friends to do the same.
Make pen pals with people of different religion and beliefs from you.
Ask your friends to do the same.

Map:
Pin a world map on your wall.
Start putting flags on the countries you have pen pals in.
Take a photo of your map every month to record the increase of the numbers of
flags.

Imagine:
Imagine all the people holding hands.
Imagine all the people hugging each other.
Imagine all the people living life in peace.

Listen:
Listen to the heartbeat:
a) your own
b) your mate's
c) your child's
Listen to people.
Listen to animals.
Listen to the planet.
Listen to the Universe.
Listen to the Earth turning.

C: DIP (Dance In Peace) Event

When you are feeling bad
Do one thing a day
To make your heart dance.
It could be a simple thing like looking up at the sky.
If you can't manage even that
Do something for somebody
To make his/her heart dance.
It could be a simple thing like giving a call.
Do this for awhile and
Your life will change in a big way.
One day we'll all dance together.
Alright? y.o.

Note: send the Peace Event to your friends. To be part of the Peace Event record, send your experience to: IK (Instant Karma)
- - -

John Lennon killer denied parole

Below is a copy of a 6 October, 2004, BBC report on the latest regarding the John Lennon's killer. I remember the heart ache I felt on December 8, 1980, like it was yesterday.

Yoko Ono and the Lennon family are serving a life sentence imposed by Chapman. There is nowhere on earth they can go for a reprieve, for parole, for a rest to forget. They are reminded every day of the wicked ways of the world.

Chapman shot John Lennon in the back in cold blood for no other reason but to gain notoriety. IMHO Chapman ought to spend the rest of his life in quiet reflection and contemplation.

He is 45 years old and has served less than 25 years. If he was freed and able to start afresh, there would be great media interest. It would fuel his notoriety and he would gain financially which in effect would allow him to cause even more suffering to the Lennon family. Just the thought of him being alive and not being behind bars is unthinkable. Everyone connected with the Lennon family must be protected from any more suffering and grief. For this reason, Chapman should serve the rest of his days behind bars.

If Chapman was ever released, someone would find him and do terrible things to him. The Lennon family must be protected from further grief over John Lennon's at all costs. I regret having to even mention Chapman's name here - giving oxygen to his desire for notoriety. Next time I won't have to mention his name - I can just point to this post. Here is a copy of the BBC report:

John Lennon's killer, Mark Chapman, will stay in prison after a parole board in New York refused his release.

The board said Tuesday's decision was based on the "extreme malicious intent" Chapman had shown in shooting the former Beatle in Manhattan in 1980.

It is the third time Chapman, 49, has tried and failed to secure his freedom.

The board told Chapman he had "a clear lack of respect for life" and subjected Lennon's widow Yoko Ono to "monumental suffering by her witnessing the crime".

The decision to keep him behind bars was based on an interview, a review of records and deliberation, the board said.

"During the interview, your statements for motivation acknowledges the attention you felt this murder would generate," they told him.

"Although proven true, such rationale is bizarre and morally corrupt."

The statement said Chapman's "positive disciplinary record" in jail was taken into account.

But it added: "To release you on parole at this time would significantly undermine respect for the law."

His previous applications for parole - in 2000, when he first became eligible after serving 20 years, and in 2002 - were also turned down.

Ono wrote to the board opposing the release, saying Chapman remained a threat to her and Lennon's sons, Sean and Julian.

She said Chapman's release would "bring back the nightmare, the chaos and the confusion once again".

Ono was with the musician when he was assassinated outside their apartment in the Dakota Building, New York on 8 December 1980.

Lennon had signed a copy of his Double Fantasy LP for Chapman earlier that day, before leaving for a recording studio - but the killer struck on the star's return home.

Chapman claimed voices in his head urged him to shoot, and he fired into Lennon's back.

He has said: "I felt like nothing, and I felt if I shot him I would become something - which is not true at all."

Chapman claimed his mental instabilities had cleared within seven or eight years of killing the musician.

Throughout his sentence, Chapman has been held at a separate facility in a maximum security prison in Attica, in New York state.

He further enraged Lennon fans in 2000, when he said he thought the musician would want him to be free.

"I think he would be liberal, I think he would care," he said.

Before Tuesday's decision, John Lennon's sister, Julia Baird, also spoke out against Chapman's release - but said she had not been consulted by the parole board.

She said she had no doubt that "somebody will try to kill him" if he was released.

_40146850_lennonap_203.jpg

Yoko Ono was with Lennon when he was shot outside their home.

Yoko Ono, 71 - Birthday message

kuva.jpg

AIU is an unofficial Yoko Ono resource. It has a messageboard where visitors are invited to talk about Yoko Ono, her work and current related events. Excerpt from the site:

The birthday book was open in February for your personal greetings to Yoko Ono in the AIU messageboard, and all greetings were mailed to Yoko on her 71st birthday on February 18th 2004.

Yoko wants to thank everyone who sent birthday greetings to her through the AIU website:

Dear friends,

Thank you for giving me the encouragement I needed so much at this time. I was getting a little depressed with the world situation, and for just having come out of a bad cold. As you may know, I don't usually get sick...maybe only once in a few years. So this was not normal at all for me! But you picked my spirit up more than you could imagine. A big hug to each one of you!

Love, yoko
- - -

logo.gif

The drawing of Yoko by Norn Cutson.

'Dior Not War' Sends A Message from the Catwalk

Here is a copy of an uplifting report from the UK's Scotsman October 5, 2004:

John Galliano transformed his catwalk into a political platform today and the message – like the clothing that carried it – was powerful: “Dior, Not War”.

Models wore wild hair and colourful cotton tops emblazoned with anti-war slogans while Imagine, John Lennon’s ode to peace, provided the musical backdrop.

Designers tend to avoid political statements, but Galliano said he could not hold back.

“It’s the way I’m feeling. I think we’re all feeling that, aren’t we?” the designer said backstage. “That John Lennon song could have been written yesterday. I mean – Imagine.”

If politics was the backstage buzz, it was only one segment of a stunningly successful Christian Dior ready-to-wear line for spring-summer 2005 that otherwise focused on femininity, colours and fun.

The collection flashed back to looks from the sophisticated 40s, the playful 50s, the politically charged 60s and the glitzy 80s – always infusing yesteryear with modern-day sassiness.

Among celebrities watching from the front row were actresses Milla Jovovich, Jane Seymour, Isabelle Adjani and Julie Delpy.

“Ultra femininity” was the theme at Vivienne Westwood, who drew inspiration from 18th century French painter Francois Boucher. The invitation was a copy of Summer, his classical pastoral scene of three women lounging in the woods.

The collection included pretty cotton floral prints on asymmetrical bustiers and sundresses. Cotton pastel skirts came with eyelet trim.

Evening wear sparkled either in gold and silver lame or in elegant classical pastel silk gowns with voluminous skirts and trains.

But, the past was not the only inspiration. Dresses also came with bold computerised prints and geometric designs created by extra flaps and folds.

Baggy blouses were paired with a harness-like bottom that created a pair of shorts with attitude.

Shoes, designed by Westwood’s husband Andreas Kronthaler, were most fun in stilettos with so much strapping they became airy summer boots. - http://news.scotsman.com/latest.cfm?id=3588476

Sunday, October 03, 2004

Gandhi's grandson urges peaceful uprising - non-violence would speed world sympathy to the Palestinians

On October 3, 2004, Reuters reported [via Bahrain Tribune Daily] that Gandhi's grandson urges peaceful uprising.

Loved the last part about how he said he believed it was not too late to start a non-violent movement in the West Bank and Gaza, captured by Israel in 1967, and condemned a wall Israel is building in the West Bank as an "evil thing".

And the part where he said "Imagine yourselves marching by the thousands behind your leaders to the checkpoints and the roadblocks demanding your free passage and the right to be treated as human beings."
"Sit at the roadblocks and sing your songs. March to the wall and dance your dances," he said, referring to the wall Israel is building in the West Bank.
Here is a copy of the report, along with a photo of the grandson of the late Mahatma Gandhi, meeting Palestinian President Yasser Arafat in Ramallah yesterday.

RAMALLAH, West Bank: The grandson of slain Indian leader Mahatma Gandhi urged Palestinians yesterday to rise up peacefully to demand an end to Israeli occupation, and said freedom was close.

Arun Gandhi, whose grandfather's campaign helped loosen Britain's grip on the Indian subcontinent, said non-violence would speed world sympathy to the Palestinians.

"I know your day of freedom is very near," he told a crowd of thousands of flag-waving Palestinians in the West Bank city of Ramallah after meeting President Yasser Arafat.

"Insist on your rights and demand your freedom peacefully ... Let the voice of reason and compassion stand up again," said Gandhi, president and founder of the US-based M. K. Gandhi Institute for Non-Violence.

A popular Palestinian uprising against Israeli occupation that began in 2000 has been overshadowed by violence. Rights groups say at least 3,000 Palestinians have been killed.

"You have been fighting for the Holy Land, but God told us there is nothing more holy than human life," Gandhi said.

Palestinians at the rally, though they gave Gandhi rounds of applause, were split on the idea of non-violence.

"The peaceful resistance he talks about is better than what we have here," said Mohammed Saber, 25. "We should be a symbol of peace to the world. In the end we are with Gandhi. We need to be better than them."

"We want peace. We want to live as they live. Isn't this our right?" said Salima Ayat, holding a framed picture of her jailed son. "We want peace by any means."

But others, like 15-year-old Mahmoud Suleiman, said they doubted non-violence could win Palestinians a state, even as they welcomed Gandhi. "It won't work," he said. "There must be both armed and peaceful resistance, and armed resistance is more important."

Gandhi said he believed it was not too late to start a non-violent movement in the West Bank and Gaza, captured by Israel in 1967, and condemned a wall Israel is building in the West Bank as an "evil thing".

"Imagine yourselves marching by the thousands behind your leaders to the checkpoints and the roadblocks demanding your free passage and the right to be treated as human beings," he said.

"Sit at the roadblocks and sing your songs. March to the wall and dance your dances," he said, referring to the wall Israel is building in the West Bank. - Reuters.

27_8_2004_e5-1.jpg

Photo: Arun Gandhi (right), grandson of Mahatma Gandhi, meets Palestinian President Yasser Arafat in Ramallah yesterday. – DPA
- - -

Note to self to put this link in sidebar: World Peace Report

Friday, October 01, 2004

THE WORLD AFTER 9/11 - Gandhi's hope for humanity

Today, I am reading and thinking about an essay entitled The World After 9/11 that I found in the online library of M.K. Gandhi Institute for Nonviolence. It is written by Arun Gandhi, the grandson of the late great Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi (assassinated during one of his daily walks in 1948).

Part of the message it conveys is that life is about giving and helping, not just about amassing and consuming; that it is essential we build community-to-community relationships and build a bond with a community while helping them in whatever way we can. And talks of a "Hope for Humanity Fund" - saving a coin every day to help a community in a Third World country.

Reminds me of a vicar who gave a £5 note to each of the children in his congregation. The children were delighted and couldn't believe their luck. The vicar challenged them to go forth and multiply the cash.

Given the challenge, each decided to spend their £5 note imaginatively. Many got involved making and selling products. Some bought seeds, soil and trays and grew crops. Others bought ingredients for making and selling cakes. One purchased a bucket and cloth and started a cleaning service. They felt motivated and encouraged to see the fruits of their labour. Each returned (bar a few failed ventures) £5 to the vicar and were thrilled at being told to keep their profits.

Here is a copy of the essay, in full:

If anything the horrid events of 9/11 have accentuated the religious divisions around the world giving one side the license to regard the other side as a "terrorist" and use repressive means to suppress and oppress the minority.

Since the "terrorists" in the WTC event happened to be Muslims and the United States is a Christian country the conclusion is that the attack is religiously motivated - and that this is a war between Muslims and Christians.

I don't think the United States was attacked because it is a Christian country. Given the circumstances that exist in the United States today and its relationships with the world, the US would have been attacked even if it were a predominantly non-Christian country by a non-Muslim group of "terrorists." We have become so embroiled in the religious fervor that we have overlooked the non-religious aspects of this conflict. The fact is the attack was motivated more by our selfish relationships rather than religious commitment.

Our volatile reaction to the World Trade Center tragedy has had several consequences: First, we jumped to the conclusion that this is a religious war; second, it has given many countries the right to brand all disaffected groups in their countries as "terrorists"; third, to look at all Muslims as potential terrorists and, fourth, it has given the world the right to use repressive and violent methods to eliminate "terrorists" within their borders.

Prime Minister of Israel, Mr. Ariel Sharon, used the same language as President Bush to justify the action he is now taking against the Palestinians and President Bush, more recently and rather thoughtlessly, condemned the Palestinian "sacrificial" bombing as motivated by Muslim religion. The fact is the Palestinian young people are not sacrificing their lives simply because their religion tells them to nor, as the American media will have us believe, are they sacrificing their lives because they are told they will enjoy luxuries and sex with beautiful women in heaven. If that is the motivation one may ask why are Muslims in so many other countries of the world with grievances not sacrificing their lives for the same purpose?

The US response to the events of 9/11 was motivated by anger. It was natural for the nation to feel anger but it was not right for the nation, as it is not right for individuals, to respond in a moment of madness. When a nation or an individual acts in a moment of madness it is always violent with violent repercussions.

I am often asked how would Gandhi react to the events of 9/11? There is a parallel in Indian history, which is very relevant. On April 19, 1919, soon after Mohandas K. Gandhi, my grandfather, launched a peaceful, nonviolent struggle against British repression, the British Military Governor of the northern state of Punjab declared martial law, severely curtailing the rights of citizens. In fact his law demanded that Indian citizens crawl on their stomachs every time they passed a British citizen on the streets or a British owned establishment. If one dared to disobey the order one would be publicly flogged, even to death.

The citizens of Punjab, inspired by grandfather's teachings of nonviolent action, peacefully protested. Ten thousand men, women and children responded to the call and assembled in the Jullianwala Garden in the heart of the city. The crowd stood peacefully listening to their leaders speak about nonviolent civil action against repression. General Dyer, the British Military Governor of Punjab, was incensed by what he considered a flagrant disregard for British authority. He assembled his troops, marched to the garden, surrounded the people and ordered the troops to open fire. In a matter of minutes hundreds of men, women and children lay dead and several thousand were grievously injured. The troops stopped firing only when they ran out of ammunition. General Dyer did not allow anyone to take care of the wounded and the dying. He said later he wanted to teach the Indians a lesson.

When the news of this mindless tragedy spread in the country the Indians were as enraged as the Americans were after September 11. If their anger was allowed to be expressed the Indians could have massacred every British person in India because in 1919 the Indians outnumbered the British 4,000 to 1. This is when grandfather intervened to turn the Indian anger into positive nonviolent action for peace. Grandfather realized he had to liberate the British from their own imperialism as much as liberate the Indians. With words of wisdom and moral leadership he turned the memory of the massacre into nonviolent power for constructive action.

Obviously, we in the United States lacked the words of wisdom and moral leadership to help us deal with the anger of September 11. Our anger was fanned into flames so that we are now embroiled in a "war on terrorism," a war that we cannot win, because terrorists are scattered all over the world and are difficult to identify. There are terrorists in the United States as well.

This worldwide witch-hunt for terrorists will lead to more violence that could make the 20th century look peaceful. Israel has already branded all Palestinians as "terrorists" and has launched a campaign to eliminate them. The fundamentalists in India have begun to look at local Muslims as "terrorists" and are building a case for harsher treatment. If the ethnic cleansing in Bosnia was savage and unlawful then this "lawful" ethnic cleansing is no better.

I have often been asked what would I do if I was President of the United States and, unfortunately, it is precisely because of what I would do that I would never be elected President of the United States. I would have spoken to the nation and calmed the people with words of wisdom. I would have gone to the United Nations as an equal member and sought world sympathy and support to deal with "terrorists" in a humane way through dialogue rather than hunting them down. I would definitely not have told members of the United Nations that you are either "with us or against us in this fight against terrorists." I would have dismissed that as a very arrogant statement, which is why most of the world despises us. We have long since proved to the world that we are a super-power in terms of our military strength can we now prove to them that we can also be a super-power in terms of our moral strength?

As President I would have asked for a complete review of our foreign policy that has for too long been based on what "is good for the United States." I think we can now afford to look at what is good for the world and do the right thing so that people in the world can aspire to live in peace and harmony. We may think it is none of our business and that we cannot go around the world and help everyone who is in need. But it is equally true that we cannot live in isolation and cannot preserve our security and sanity while the rest of the world falls apart. As individuals and as nations we are inter-related, inter-connected and inter-dependent and the sooner we realize and respect this fact the better it will be for all of us.

It is not enough that we give government-to-government aid because much of the aid is consumed by corrupt officials. It is essential that we build community-to-community relationships and build a bond with a community while helping them in whatever way we can. We helped a community in Jamtland, Sweden, build a relationship with a community in Amravati, India, in 1978. This relationship is going strong and both communities have benefited immensely from this interaction. We need to do this on a large scale. To begin with the communities in the United States can start a "Hope for Humanity Fund" - saving a coin every day to help a community in a Third World country. The reason why we need to save a coin everyday is because we must be conscious every day of the need to help someone, somewhere in the world. Writing a check at the end of the year does not create the consciousness that is necessary to build a relationship. Saving a coin everyday also gets children involved in the process and they learn early that life is about giving and helping and not just about amassing and consuming.

This is the only way we can save the world from a violent destruction.

[end of excerpt]

The power of nonviolence lies in empowering the individual to become "the change we wish to see in the world."

The following is a copy of an essay by Arun Gandhi, grandson of the late great Gandhi:

During the second presidential debate when Governor Bush repeatedly asserted that his foreign policy would be based on "What is good for the United States" and that the US defense budget will be doubled to make the US armed forces the most powerful in the world and that the role of the armed forces is to fight and win wars and not indulge in "nation building" my heart sank to the soles of my feet. Are we still going to bully the world into behaving by threatening violence? Can we win friends by being brutish?Is it not time now for the United States to become a "Hope for Humanity" and help rebuild a world that has for too long languished in ignorance and poverty?

The power of nonviolence lies, Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi said, in empowering the individual to become "the change we wish to see in the world."

In a small way my friends and I sought a solution to the vexing problem of population influx into Mumbai (Bombay). The hopelessly poor from nearby villages poured into the city in search of survival. Old solutions of banishing the poor to their fate or allowing them to languish in misery were outdated. Mahipatrao Mohite, a determined social worker, sought answers in Gandhi's nonviolence. Mohite joined us in an attempt to convince some 600 of the poorest living on the sidewalks of Mumbai to help break the cycle of poverty. They originated from a cluster of villages near Sangli, 200 miles south of Mumbai, and had lost all hope. We persuaded them to save a coin every day and build a fund which could be used to help them.

This was almost an impossible challenge but they agreed. In about 18-20 months they collaboratively raised the equivalent of $11,000. This amount was invested in small textile machines to start a factory in Vita village. About 70 contributors went back to their village to operate the factory round the clock so that eventually all the 600 people could enjoy a higher standard of living. They now have four units in four villages and all the 600 poor are living a much more decent and hopeful life. They continued with the habit of saving coins and in 1978 they opened the Sangli Jilla Kamgar Cooperative Bank in Mumbai which now has seven branches and total assets worth about $2 million. This program helped rebuild their self-respect and self-confidence.

For many years my wife, Sunanda, and I have followed this example of saving small every day. At year end when we go to India with our students to study Gandhi's nonviolence in action the humble donation of about $300-$400 goes a long way to help people and institutions in their constructive work.

Thursday, September 30, 2004

M.K. Gandhi Institute for Nonviolence - First Annual Gandhian Nonviolence Conference October 8-9, 2004

mkgadhi_write.gif

"My life is my message" - M.K.Gandhi

Gandhi quotes:

"An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind"

"If my faith burns bright, as I hope it will even if I stand alone, I shall be alive in the grave, and what is more, speaking from it"
- - -

First Annual Gandhian Nonviolence Conference

M.K. Gandhi Institute for Nonviolence event information.

Further reading:

The Official Mahatma Gandhi eArchive & Reference Library
M.K. Gandhi Institute for Nonviolence
Mahatma Gandhi

Thursday, September 23, 2004

Cyberspace and blogosphere is a fenceless and doorless world: togetherness is the only power we have

"...In this doorless world, let's learn to aim high in our dreams - together there is nothing we can't do..."

In the next post, here below, is a copy of an essay by Yoko Ono and John Lennon entitled "Feminine Revolution".

It was written thirty-two years ago and is extracted from articles contained in the Spring and Summer 1972 editions of Sundance magazine. 

Although the words are attributed to John and Yoko jointly, they would appear to be written largely by Yoko.

In the piece, Yoko and John talk about us, the people, being the media. On reading the essay, I couldn't help thinking about the blogging revolution - the Second Superpower - memories of the hopes and dreams people had when they sang about power to the people - making love not war - banning the bomb - and the extraordinary flower power era.

Where have all those people gone? What are they doing now? What are their hopes and dreams now? What do they think of today's news headlines and the hotspots in my sidebar here on the right of your screen - along with Africa's descent into nightmare? - What are the hopes and dreams of their children?

This week, I've thought about (dare I say it: starting) a revolution. I've been thinking along these lines ever since last year when I blogged about genocide that happened ten years ago in Bosnia (a two hour flight away from England) and started to explore the reasons behind mans inhumanity to man.

I've spent many hours over the past 40 years thinking about the feasibility of settling war with love - using the mind and love instead of weapons that only create more violence. Recently, I'm beginning to conclude that it's not as far fetched as it sounds. In fact, I believe it is the only way to quash hatred and violence. A friend of mine thinks it will take 5,000 years or more. Well, hey, one has to start make a start sometime.

Countless people have written on this subject. Many have dedicated (and given) their lives to such issues. Much of it has been recorded. Surely, now that so many of us around the world have computers, there is a way of pulling it all together, disseminating the information and lobbying to put theory into practice.

All that is good seems to come from love. Love seems to be what everybody wants and needs. In my experience to date, seems few of us want or need violence - and most are not even remotely interested in genocide.

Everybody is interested in love. Who can get enough of the real thing? We are addicted to it. And thrive on it. Compared to hate, love isn't bad at all. So love must be a good thing. And hate must be a bad thing. Who thrives on hatred?

Even my cat Ophelia thrives on love. Three years ago, when she first arrived here from a rescue center, she acted feral. Terrified, shy and nervous. A young loner that had never been handled, cared for or loved. The rescue center said they'd named her Ophelia because she reminded them of a Shakesperean tragedy. They suspected she had been cruelly treated. Her jittery nervousness made me think they were right. Somebody found her dumped and handed her to the nearest vet where she was kept for 4 weeks. Nobody claimed her, or reported her as missing, and so she was passed on to the rescue center where she stayed for 4 weeks. I was the first person to show an interest in her. Heh. Lucky girl (me I mean).

During Ophelia's first year here, the sound of newspaper would make her run away in fear. Now, after lots of tender loving care and respect she acts completely differently. She is playful, confident and contented. Purrs (didn't purr for a year), talks out loud and communicates humour with her body language. She is Queen of the castle around here and guards her territory well. Patrols it four times a day (but never brings me 'presents' - vet says that means she 'eats out' - heh).

Ophelia is so well behaved, affectionate, gentle and sweet natured. She never gives me cause for concern and understands the word no (not that I ever have to use it, except like 'no it's too late to go out now') and doesn't put a foot wrong - ever.

On reflection, I feel Ophelia has given back to me one thousand fold of what I have given to her. Giving love sure does work - and multiplies all by itself.
- - -

A FENCELESS AND DOORLESS WORLD:
TOGETHERNESS IS THE ONLY POWER WE HAVE:
In this doorless world, let's learn to aim high in our dreams - together there is nothing we can't do

One of my favourite lines in the "Feminine Revolution" piece by Yoko Ono and John Lennon is "The fenceless and doorless world is soon to come."

It reminds me of our great blogosphere. The doorless world that John and Yoko write about is now here. We bloggers can join in the doorless world and learn to aim high in our dreams. Together, there is nothing we can't do.

These four gems from the essay are really quite special:

(1) Don't wait for the world to reach you -- you are the aware ones -- reach out. Reach out. Reach out with love. Love communicates, whereas hatred, in the end, does not. Extend your hand with love. There cannot be a true world revolution without the support of the silent majority.

(2) The world is now split into two kinds of people, and only two! One is the kind who communicate, and the other is the kind who doesn't. Those who don't, believe that they can't because they have no access to the communications media.

(3) But you are the media. People are. Your message is the media not the other way around, and the media does not exist without people. Let's believe in people and their power. Total communication equals peace. Violence is to eliminate ignorance, apathy and hatred. Let's not fight among ourselves. Togetherness is the only power we have.

(4) Water, on its own accord, always comes together. We're all water from different rivers. That's why it's so easy to meet. Barriers are products of our imagination. Why can't we focus our energies on a more positive image? Imagine there are no countries...all the people living life in peace. Imagine. Believe in it coming...sing about it, do something about it, and we are half way there.

Thinkpiece: "Feminine Revolution" - by Yoko Ono and John Lennon

There are no two mouths alike. Our bodies, in fact, are an assurance of our uniqueness. But we share our minds and our dreams. A dream you dream alone may be a dream, but a dream we dream together is reality. Positive attitudes create positive situations. Let's learn to aim high in our dreams. Together, there is nothing we can't do.

To middle America who are afraid of youth and the future: Please don't be afraid. Don't try to stop running water. Join us. If change is inevitable, let's change for the better for all of us. Our future cannot be anything but brightness. The law of nature is that once one knows, one can never unknow what one knows. Rapidly, more and more people will be aware. Without trying, the world is heading for perfect awareness - and you are part of it. You are part of the running water. The fenceless and doorless world is soon to come. It's our fear which is keeping the doors closed and the fences high. Please don't be afraid. Open your minds, they belong to the world. The mind knows no pain in the act of sharing, while sharing bread is often pain. Join us! - in the doorless world.

To the hard hats who think that they don't have the power to free themselves from the tyranny and suppression of the capitalists: It's not their power or money that is controlling you, as is generally believed.  Their power depends on your fear and apathy. Once your awareness and confidence equals theirs, how could they keep you down?  You outnumber them, don't let them close your eyes.  I will send to you only in ESP.

To the youth who think they are silenced by the media and alienated from the world: The future is yours.  Have the patience of a pregnant woman.  But don't wait for the world to reach you. You are the aware ones.  Reach out.   Reach out.  Reach out with love.  Love communicates, whereas hatred, in the end, doesn't. Extend your hand to middle America with love. There cannot be a true world revolution without the support of the silent majority.

The world is now split into two kinds of people, and only two! One is the kind who communicate, and the other is the kind who doesn't. Those who don't, believe that they can't because they have no access to the communications media.

But you are the media. People are. Your message is the media not the other way around, and the media does not exist without people. Let's believe in people and their power. Total communication equals peace. Violence is to eliminate ignorance, apathy and hatred. Let's not fight among ourselves. Togetherness is the only power we have.

Water, on its own accord, always comes together. We're all water from different rivers. That's why it's so easy to meet. Barriers are products of our imagination. Why can't we focus our energies on a more positive image? Imagine there are no countries...all the people living life in peace. Imagine. Believe in it coming...sing about it, do something about it, and we are half way there.

Our society is driven by neurotic speed and force, accelerated by greed and the frustration of not being able to live up to the image of men and women we have created for ourselves - an image which has nothing do with the reality of people. How can we be eternal James Bond or Twiggy and raise three kids on the side? So we pass our kids on to babysitters, nursery and high school teachers - three of the most underpaid positions in our society! How can we help but do this when our wives constantly complain about insufficient material earnings, comparing us with Onassis. Or when we are living under the constant threat of losing our husbands to girls on the street with false eyelashes and the never-had-a-baby-or-a-full-meal look. In such an image-driven culture, a piece of reality like a child becomes a direct threat to our very false existence.

The only game we play together with our children is star-chasing; sadly, not stars in the sky, but "Stars" who we think have achieved the standard of the dream image we have imposed on the human race.  We cannot trust ourselves anymore, because we know we have not "made it".  Because we know that we are, well...too real.

The fact that we are not fake should make us happy, but instead, we are forever apologetic for being real.  "Excuse me for shitting, excuse me for farting, excuse me for making love and smelling like a human being," we say, "instead of being that odorless, celluloid prince and princess image out there on the screen."

A professor who lives in a three tatami room in Tokyo (one tatami is a size of a mat for one person to lie down on) says he needs one tatami for himself, another for his companion, and the third for the two to breathe in. "In order for me to keep a room larger than a three-tatami in an overpopulated city like Tokyo, I have to use additional energy to fight for it.  Any possession that is more than what you need belongs to someone who needs it. I don't want to waste my energies keeping it."   He further claims that there are two poverty lines in this world. One is where you starve, the other is where you have excessive possessions.  He has donated his only other possession - his books - to the local library.

In two-thousand years of effort, men have demonstrated to us their failure in running the world.  Instead of falling into the same trap as men, women can offer something that society never, because of male dominance, had before. That is feminine direction.

Of course the question will be asked, "What is femininity and masculinity?"  The stereotype ideas of femininity and masculinity really have nothing to do with the true nature of men and women.  In fact, most people in our society show both masculine and feminine tendencies at the same time.  But to a great extent, both men and women have believed in their own myths and have subsequently developed stereotype characters of themselves.  As a result, quite apart from what men and women really are, so-called masculine and feminine tendencies do prevail in our society as characteristics of the society itself.

What we can do is to bring out the more feminine nature in society to replace the masculine one which is now at work as a very negative force. We can thus make more positive use of the feminine tendencies of the society which, up to now, have been either suppressed or dismissed as something to be ashamed of or even as harmful, impractical and/or irrelevant in the making of that society.  Obviously, a feminine society is not to be mistaken for a female-dominated society.

The contemporary society is competitive, logical (inasmuch as the society makes an or pretense of basing its thinking on logic) and power-oriented in its structure.  Hypocrisy, violence and chaos result from this structure.  We can now change the society with the feminine touch, or rather with feminine intelligence and awareness, into a basically organic, non-competitive one based on love rather than reasoning. The result will be balance, peace and contentment.

We can evolve rather than revolt, come together rather than claim independence, and feel rather than think.  Now these are characteristics that are considered feminine and which men despise.  But have men done so well by avoiding the development of these characteristics within themselves?

What our society needs now is not the speed born of competition, the invention of faster and faster machines, nor the so-called reality based on rational and practical thinking.  The outcome of such reasoning is at best a two- to four- dimensional perception of reality, which is a limiting observation of life.

What we need now is the patience and natural wisdom of a pregnant woman; an awareness and acceptance of our natural resources (what is left of them); and the healthy existence of our bodies and feelings.  Let's not kid ourselves and think of ours as an old and mature civilization. We are by no means mature.  But that is all right.  That is beautiful.  Let's slow down, and try to grow organically, and as healthy as a newborn infant.  The aim of the female revolution will have to be a total one, eventually making it a revolution for the whole world, since we can never separate ourselves from the world.

420x305yokobirthday.jpg

Yoko Initiates New Peace Prize - Profile and November 2001 Interview

yokopeaceprize.jpg

Yoko Ono, widow of the late Beatle John Lennon, has inaugurated her own peace award by giving $50,000 prize money to Israeli and Palestinian artists.
- - -

Yoko Ono

yokoono.jpg

Excerpt (undated) from an unofficial website featuring Yoko Ono:

Artistically misunderstood, derisively known as the most famous widow in the world and vilified as the catalyst for the breakup of the most famous music group of all time, Yoko Ono in actuality is an uncompromising artistic visionary who was already an avant-garde superstar before she met John Lennon. Today, Yoko is finally recognized as an influential artist who pushes the boundaries of the art, film, music and theatre media. The present time marks a renewed resurgence of interest and celebration of her work. She has recently received high media profile due to the simultaneous reissue of her music catalog (including a boxed set) on the Rykodisc specialty label as well as for the premiere of her off-Broadway theatre piece Hiroshima. However these achievements obscure her body of 16 films made between 1964 and 1972, some in collaborative effort with her late husband.

Yoko Ono (whose first name translates to "ocean child") was born on February 18, 1933 in Tokyo, the eldest of three children born to Eisuke and Isoko, a wealthy aristocratic family. Her father was a frustrated pianist who held degrees from Tokyo universities in mathematics and economics. In 1935 he became head of a Japanese bank in San Francisco, as a result he did not meet Yoko until she was two years old, since she stayed behind in Tokyo with her mother.

[Photo and text courtesy of Yoko Ono unofficial website insert link]
- - -

Just imagine

The following is a copy of an interview with Yoko Ono published in The Observer on November 4, 2001.

In the 60s, Yoko Ono married John Lennon and campaigned for peace in Vietnam. More than 30 years on, she's still irrevocably linked to her dead husband and America is once again at war. Here, she talks to Andrew Smith about marriage, art and inner peace

How does it feel to have the whole context of your life and work changed in an instant? And then frozen in another? Yoko Ono was a star of the New York avant-garde art scene when Lennon walked into her show at the Indica Gallery in London in 1966, grabbed one of the exhibits, a green apple on a glass plinth, cutely labelled 'Apple', and took a bite out of it. She was cross. 'Oh, I was terribly cross,' she says. 'He'd been showing his sophisticated artist side, and then he suddenly did that and I thought, oh dear...'

Reminded that the value of the exhibit probably increased a thousandfold, she laughs. Her voice surprises in its sing-song pleasantness. She has turned 68, but could pass for 20 years younger. Ono will not be what I expected in any sense, and the answers to those opening questions will be even less straightforward.

'It was funny. I didn't know what to make of my feelings for him. He was very sexy. In that first meeting, he showed a sense of humour and very complex sides of his personality. But for me, he was also... I think that in the crowd I was in, in the avant-garde, there were a lot of guys who were extremely interesting as composers, but I didn't feel anything coming from them. No kind of guy guy thing. He had a charge, a force. And I felt that.'

She's sitting at the mosaic dining table in the kitchen of the rambling top-floor apartment she shared with Lennon in the Dakota building, the gothic apartment block where Polanski filmed Rosemary's Baby and outside which the former Beatle was shot by Mark Chapman as he stepped through the entrance arch on 8 December 1980. There are Magrittes and Warhols on the walls and, down the hall in the 'white room', the piano on which 'Imagine' was written. Like so many before, I will stand in front of it resisting an urge to play something, while not being quite sure where either impulse (to play, not to play) is coming from. Today would have been his 61st birthday and is also that of his son, Sean, who will be a sullen presence in the background of this first meeting. I wonder if he's angry with his mum for working today.

Lennon's birthday aside, it's a strange time to be visiting. I've seen the remains of the World Trade Center and realised with horror that the lonely, cathedral-shaped spear of steel frame that defied the destruction will be the first iconic image of the 21st century. Ambling through Central Park towards the Dakota on this cold, clear morning, I came across several dozen people singing a shrill chorus of 'Give Peace a Chance'. And I wondered, what's changed? Where is John and Yoko's Nutopia? According to the newscasters, the last time such a concentration of American bombers had been assembled was in March 1945, when Tokyo was razed to the ground and 83,000 people were killed.

Strangely, she was there.

Lennon had been born into a chaotic working-class family, but Ono (born 18 February 1933) was an heir to privilege. Her father was an aspiring concert pianist turned banker, while her mother came from the wealthy Yasuda banking clan, and she was schooled at the Japanese equivalent of Eton. Nevertheless, during the war, they struggled as everyone else. She remembers being woken at night and hustled into a bomb shelter, where the group would listen to the series of regular thuds coming closer, then fading like the steps of a retreating giant into the distance. At one point, the children were evacuated to the country, where the city kids were despised by the farmers they were billeted with.

'It was very frightening,' she replies, when asked if the experience marked her permanently. Kids must have had to learn to rely on themselves and contain their feelings. 'Oh of course, I have that side, too. Even now, I'm always thankful that we have something to eat and a roof over our heads. Because there was a time when we were starving. I also tend to keep paper bags and boxes and things, I can't throw them away. My daughter thinks it's funny.'

She has said that she was 'always afraid' as a child and always felt herself to be an outsider - which is odd, because, as we shall see, she grew into a remarkably fearless adult.

Moving to the US with her family after the war, Ono went to art college. Her father was passionate about Western classical music and had made sure she was schooled in it, while her mother taught her Japanese idioms - making her at the time one of very few people in the West with an intimate understanding of both. In her early twenties, she hit Manhattan and married the Japanese piano prodigy, Ichiyanagi Toshi, subse quently falling in with the clique of avantgarde composers gathered around the likes of John Cage, David Tudor and La Monte Young (whose first collection of musicians went on to become the Velvet Under- ground). Ultimately, this movement would be known as Fluxus, and Ono, as a pioneer of 'performance art', would be a dynamic force within it.

As the 60s began, she reluctantly moved back to Japan with her husband, but, unable to work properly, she was miserable and is said to have attempted suicide in 1962, at the age of 29. Eventually, she met the American Tony Cox, who had admired her paintings, and returned to New York, where he became her promoter. Friends had expressed doubts about his advisability as a partner, and this - in keeping with the pattern of her life - proved to be a volatile, if professionally successful partnership. They had a daughter, Kyoko, whom Cox would finally wrest custody of by citing Ono and Lennon's dissolute, drug-sodden lifestyle, and later disappear with. Yoko wouldn't see Kyoko again for 25 years, and if you look at news footage from the time, was clearly seen to be heartbroken, but before then her career had taken off. Which is how she came to be invited to swinging London in 1966 ('It was, like, bang! - I couldn't believe what was going on there') and to have her own fateful exhibition at the Indica gallery in November 1966.

The tales of her camping out in front of Lennon's house until he let her in are not true, she says. 'I didn't even know where he lived. That's not my way of doing things. And also, I wasn't that intent on connecting with him. The point is that now people read those stories and think it's beautiful. Women send me letters saying, "Oh, it's so beautiful to know that you were so forceful and thank you for doing that for John", and stuff like that. But I went to Paris after we met and said that I wouldn't go back to London. I didn't want a relationship at the time, because I wanted freedom for my work. And I don't like the idea that I'm creating a situation where women think that they have to stalk a man to get them. It's really serious! No, don't stalk them!'

She dissolves into laughter again. From everything I've read and heard, he seemed the more besotted at that point. 'Well, I thought that and I thought that I didn't want to get too involved in it. It seemed like the wrong situation at the wrong time. I was already aware that there was an entourage looking at me like, "What are you trying to do?" and I thought, I'm not trying to do anything, leave me out of this. It's like, something told me this is bad news - and it was!'

People have asked what John Lennon saw in her. One of the things, certainly, was her art. There is a growing body of critical opinion which holds that meeting Lennon was the worst thing that could have happened to Yoko Ono as an artist in her own right. Her poetry's never been up to much, but her broad musical sensibility and feral singing voice were intriguing enough for the titanic jazz saxophonist Ornette Coleman to invite her to join him for a performance at the Royal Albert Hall in 1966 ('Only if we do my compositions, I told him') and some of her Zen-touched visual work has been inspired.

A pioneer of conceptual art as now practised by Damien Hirst, Tracey Emin, Jake and Dinos et al, she was about tickling the imagination. A chess set, in brass, with all the pieces enamelled white, is entitled Play It By Trust ; a glass case containing four glass keys becomes Glass Keys to Open the Sky . Blood oozes from under the lid of a brass box labelled Family Album (this one post-John). A grey line on canvas is accompanied by the handwritten suggestion that 'This line is part of a very large circle'. At the time of that first London show, she had just been on the evening news while making her Bottoms film, which depicted 365 perambulating bums, accompanied by the subjects' commentary on the experience. The sense of play and mischief is what got lost in the mainstream shift that followed Ono's liaison with Lennon, while the avant-garde shunned her for 'selling out'.

Ono appears taken aback when I ask why she always wears shades (today's are tinted blue), spluttering, 'I don't know. I did that even when John and I were together... probably.' Actually, I don't think she did. She's a fascinating woman, but a difficult interviewee. She smiles and laughs, but turns hostile in a beat, often in anticipation of a question you'd never even considered asking, and is fiendishly hard to engage with. On occasion, I suspect her of using the subject of John, which is safe because everything's been said, as a shield to protect herself from scrutiny. Perhaps this is what it's like being frozen in time by a man with a gun: only much later am I able to recognise the contradiction between the openness and generosity of her political ideas and her anger with 'the world' she once accused of killing her husband. I'd imagined this to have been uttered out of immediate hurt, but when I ask if she still believes it and whether she excuses herself (and the other 'poets', perhaps?) from being part of 'the world', things will take a bewildering turn. Ono may well be as tough to do business with as McCartney, the other Beatles and her stepson Julian complain that she is.

The most interesting stuff comes up where I least expect it, around a retrospective exhibition, Yes Yoko Ono, and a new album, Blueprint for a Sunrise , which was made with her son Sean's deft band, IMA. She was going to call the record Sondown , she says, because she liked the play on words, but was pulled up short. 'I thought, I don't want to write a song called "Sondown". I thought, my God this is terrible. I always think in terms of multiple meanings. I don't want to lay that on my future, or my son. So I thought, no, I have to write something about "Sonrise".'She laughs. 'Then I thought, but there's no son rise here - I mean, yes, Sean is doing OK, but the point is in the society.'

You think that you can bring things into being with your songs, I ask? She mentions 'Walking on Thin Ice', the tune which she and Lennon had been working on and was in his cassette machine when he was shot in the archway of the Dakota.

'Afterwards, I was always thinking, why did I write that? Because you know they're playing it all over the world, and I was actually walking on thin ice after John's passing. I thought, did I set this up?'

A belief in that kind of power must be frightening for an artist. 'It's scary, but you know in hindsight, a lot of things did happen that I was not aware of at the time.'

Are there other instances where you think your work changed the future? 'Well, I think 'Imagine' was prophetic, in a very positive way. I think it's all right that it's not fashionable or faddish and might seem simple.'

Only afterwards does it dawn on me quite how wildly untrue this statement is, even if the song did piss off the Nixon administration and seem challenging for a while at the time. I enquire after two of the most striking tunes on Sunrise - 'I Want You to Remember Me' and 'Rising II', both of which are funky little dramas centred around a woman being attacked by men. She seems to have heard me suggest that the stories being told are about her in a literal sense, where they actually sound more generalised to me.

'I object to that. If a woman writes about a domestic situation, everyone automatically assumes that it's about her. I'm speaking for victims. In 'Rising', I was thinking about a little girl, an abused little child - which was probably me. I mean, that's not what happened to me, though.'

She draws a clever parallel between people and the environment, the world generally. 'It's the same sort of logic in a way. We tend to misuse an object that is passive.'

We fall to talking about the sleeve, which has her dressed as the 'Dragon Lady' of Chinese legend. It's what the British press used to call her, referring to the last empress of China, who history paints as a tyrant, but was actually a fierce defender of her people against the colonising British, according to Ono.

'We learnt about her in school in Japan and she was always quoted as an example of how cruel women can be when they get power, and I totally believed it. And it was like I was in the same position of protecting a country, which was the Nutopia. Which they did not like. It was a kind of conceptual country that I was protecting. I thought the parallel was interesting. There were many monstrous things that were said about me.'

Her notoriety is ascribed to her being not only a woman, but an Asian woman (not long after Pearl Harbor and Korea and during the war in Vietnam) and, worst of all, an avant-garde artist who'd snagged one of the most blindly revered men in the world.

'I was trying their patience, without wanting to. I understand now and I think that it's interesting that all of us together had to go through that to come to a kind of awareness of each other. Now when people meet an Asian woman, I don't think they automatically think of Madame Butterfly or geisha.' She laughs brightly. 'And the attitude to women is changing, which is not my doing, but I was part of it.'

All of which is probably right, though the conspiratorial closeness which unsettled the Beatles in the studio probably also made others uncomfortable. Not that it's anyone else's business, but it seemed to come mostly from John and could look a little desperate.

'Well,' she says, 'he was extremely insecure in that way. I think he didn't want to leave me alone - that's one thing. But also, we were in love, like teenagers. We wanted to be together. And I think that, in his mind, probably, he knew the others were not happy about it. But in his usual way, he was saying, "Forget it! Too bad!" Their relations had been strained anyway after his "We're bigger than Jesus" remark. And he felt guilty, but also he was angry. But the anger was repressed anger, because he couldn't blame anybody else! But there was also the feeling of being caged in by the band at that point.'

When she talks about him like this, you feel Lennon's presence at the other end of the table, still alive for her and smiling affectionately back, and I become aware that few people are forced to continually rake over the death of a close partner the way that she is.

Two days later, we're shoeless in the 'white room' and Yoko is sternly instructing me that she doesn't want to talk about the recent split from antique dealer Sam Havadtoy, her partner of many years, which strikes me as amusing because I didn't know about such a split until she mentioned it - though I had intended to ask how anyone can sustain romantic ties with her when the relationship with Lennon is still so present. Anyway, now she asks me not to mention that, or the fact that she'd explained her attraction to John in terms of his sexiness. It's early and she's tired, because Sean and his young and notably more gorgeous than him girlfriend left for home in LA today and they stayed up late, chatting.

We talk more about John and spend some time on the Fluxus years, much of which is interesting, but all of which I've heard before, then come to the war on terrorism. After I'd left the other day, her PA had called to say that, contrary to what Ono told me, her most recent artwork was not the spectacular piece currently receiving rave review in Yokahama; an old Nazi box car such as Jews were transported in, with mounted machine guns and a powerful searchlight streaming to the heavens through a hole in the top and myriad bullet holes, as recorded ambient noise swarms around it. Rather, it consisted of two things I would find down by Times Square, which turned out to be a pair of billboards containing stark black lower-case type over a pure white background, quoting portions of the lyric to 'Imagine'. Surrounded by all the corporate logos and screaming neon lights, they're effective, and we're on to the subject of the war on terrorism. Ono feels that she's been there before and learnt a thing or two.

'Some people may feel that it's necessary to strike back, and when someone is striking out you don't go and stand in front of them and try to stop them. I'm saying, "We don't fight for peace, we have to be peaceful." Which is different. In the 60s we fought for peace, when the Vietnam war was on. We were against the cops and against the politicians and there was a lot of waving banners and all that. And I think in a way, just as they were enjoying that machoism of war, we were enjoying the machismo of being anti-war, you know? So I thought, not this time, it's too complicated a situation. We cannot enjoy the machoism of fighting for peace. I felt that I wanted John's fans to know that. You can stand for peace, but not fight for it.

'There were some factions of flower children who felt - rightly - extremely angered by injustice and so they wanted to wake up the politicians, bomb the White House, whatever. And John and I were saying, you can't do that, that's not how we do it. They would say the result is the most important thing. But no, the result is important, but so are the means. So I think our side felt that John and Yoko were too tame and optimistic. And felt that was Yoko's fault.' She laughs. 'But kids were hurt. John was kind of angered that innocent kids were led to demonstrate because the leaders told them too, et cetera. So this time we don't fight for peace. And if the truth be told, the people who are fighting today, probably think that they are fighting for peace, too. Probably we are all imagining the same thing in the end, but we have different ideas of how to get there.'

And our time is up and I go away feeling strangely deflated. It's lovely to think that we might all want the same thing, or even imagine the same thing in the end, but we don't. I don't want the same thing as George Bush, or the president of Exxon or the people who make the bombs being dropped on Afghanistan right now. Pretending that we do, flowerchild-style, looks to me like another way of avoiding inconvenient truths, part of a legacy of self-delusion that Ono's generation left to mine; just one more way of getting people to shut up and stop asking questions. Which, you frequently get the feeling, is what Ono wants more than anything else.

Later, on the phone, I finally get a chance to ask whether she still feels that John was killed 'by the world'. 'Yes,' she states flatly. But what do you mean by that? 'I think I mean what I said.' But the world didn't kill John literally. Aren't you part of the world? 'I don't think I have anything to add,' she concludes sharply.

So I ask whether her 60s ideals have survived the decades intact, or been tempered by time? 'Look,' she says, 'we're growing up together, the human race. And we've discovered a lot of things that we didn't know. We're finding our way. Instead of thinking about doomsday all the time, think about how beautiful the world is. We're all together and together we're getting wiser.'

Another lovely thought. The irony is that she sounds kind of angry as she says it.

Yoko Ono and musicians gather for Sudan appeal

Musicians have united to voice their disgust and create a global awareness of situation in the Sudan.

Yoko Ono, Gorillaz, SOAD and other musicians gather for Sudan appeal.

For more information: waxploitation.com/genocide

More on other artists and musicians will be added here later on.

Thinkpiece: "While Men Make War, Women Wage Peace" - by Swanee Hunt and Cristina Posa

Note to study report entitled "While men make war, women wage peace" authored by Swanee Hunt and Cristina Posa in December 2001. Plan to post more on this at a later date.

Adapted from a longer piece in the May/June edition of Foreign Policy Magazine. December 2, 2001 reprinted from the Toronto Star:

Swanee Hunt is director of the Women and Public Policy Program at Harvard University's John F. Kennedy School of Government and a former U.S. ambassador to Austria (1993-97).

Cristina Posa, a former judicial clerk at the U.N. International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, is an attorney in New York.

A world of women for world peace - PeaceWatch: U.S. Institute of Peace

Interesting to note there is a PeaceWatch U.S. Institute of Peace.

wpeace.jpg

Top, left to right: Congresswoman Eddie Bernice Johnson, Harriet Hentges, and Gay McDougall of the International Human Rights Law Group. Bottom, left to right: Sanam Naraghi-Anderlini of Women Waging Peace, Deepa Ollapally, and Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi.

It'd be good to see more women peace advocates seeking a greater voice in preventing and resolving international conflict.

Media baron Ted Turner says women should run the world because men have "mucked it up" with too much warfare and military spending

Here is a snippet found on the internet that I intend to find out more about for a forthcoming post here:

" ... A billionaire media baron has taken a step to demonstrate his belief that women should run the world because men have "mucked it up" with too much warfare and military spending.

The United Nations Foundation Ted Turner established six years ago to distribute the £1 billion he pledged to UN causes has a new female-dominated board of directors.

"I've said for years and I'm really serious about it, I think men should be barred from holding public office for 100 years. The men have been running the world for too long and they've made a mess of it. ..."

Nobel Prize Winner Desmond Tutu suggests a "feminine revolution" takes place so that the fairer sex can rule the world

Women should rule the world said Desmond Tutu speaking at a signing ceremony between the Desmond Tutu Peace Trust and the City of Cape Town.

Last month, on the day after Women's Day, former Anglican archbishop of Cape Town Desmond Tutu waxed lyrical about women, suggesting that a "feminine revolution" take place so that the fairer sex can rule the world.

Tutu was speaking at a signing ceremony between the Desmond Tutu Peace Trust and the City of Cape Town which brought a step closer the erection of a building bearing his name in the city CBD.

"Some of the best initiatives are those that occur because women are involved... It is almost a tacit acknowledgement of the crucial role that women play in nurturing, nurturing life," said Tutu in his tribute to women a day after Women's Day.

Tutu, who was seemingly mentally spurred on by Cape Town's sobriquet "Mother City", said that men had been given centuries to rule the world, but "have made a heck of a mess of things".

Tutu said the revolution he referred was one of women who were not afraid to be feminine, and who did not ape men in, for example, the stereotypical aggression.

"This revolution... is the last, best chance for making this globe hospitable to peace, to make this globe hospitable to compassion, hospitable to generosity and caring," he said. [Full Story]

tcon.jpg

x.jpg

When we heard the revelations of unspeakable atrocities committed during the apartheid era we were appalled at how low we human beings can sink, that we had this horrendous capacity for evil, all of us.

Then we heard the moving stories of the victims of those and other atrocities relating how despite all they had suffered they were willing to forgive their tormentors, revealing a breathtaking magnanimity and generosity of spirit, then we realised that we have a wonderful capacity for good.

Yes people are fundamentally good. They, we, are made for love, generosity, sharing, compassion - for transcendence.

We are made to reach for the stars.

Desmond Tutu.

[Source: Courtesy "Tutu's handwritten message of wisdom" Hands That Shape Humanity]

This weblog is dedicated to the peace makers of the world

This weblog is dedicated to the peace makers of the world.

With special love to Archbishop Desmond Tutu, the Dalai Lama, John Lennon and Yoko Ono, to name a few.

It was born on United Nation's International Day of Peace September 22, 2004.

Quash the fires of hatred.